Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Metaphor and intertextuality in media framings ...

Electronic data

  • Metaphor and Intertextuality in Media Framings of the (1984-85) British Miner's Strike

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Discourse and Communication, 11 (1), 2017, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Discourse and Communication page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/dcm on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 1 MB, PDF-document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Metaphor and intertextuality in media framings of the (1984-85) British Miners' Strike: a multimodal analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>02/2017
<mark>Journal</mark>Discourse and Communication
Issue number1
Volume11
Number of pages28
Pages (from-to)3-30
<mark>State</mark>Published
Early online date22/01/17
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

The British Miners’ Strike of 1984-1985 represents one of the most pivotal periods in British industrial relations. Media stance toward the miners remains a controversial issue today, as attested by recent publications looking back at the strike (Williams 2009a, 2014). Here, authors including miners, journalists and other commentators argue that media coverage of the strike followed a consistently anti trade union agenda in which the media sought to destabilise the strike. An internal BBC report only recently made public shows that the BBC themselves had concerns over possible imbalances in their coverage of the so-called ‘Battle of Orgreave’ (Harcup 2014). Despite the weight attached to media coverage in this context, however, surprisingly little research has been conducted from a discourse-analytical perspective to show systematically and empirically how such an agenda may have been manifested across media texts. In this paper, drawing on Critical Cognitive Linguistics, I show how one particular metaphorical framing of the strike, which construed the strike as a war between the State and the National Union of Miners, persisted through the year long period and consider the potential ideological functions of this framing in media strategies of (de)legitimation. I show how this metaphor featured in linguistic, visual and multimodal forms of media representation

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Discourse and Communication, 11 (1), 2017, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Discourse and Communication page:
http://journals.sagepub.com/home/dcm on SAGE Journals Online:
http://journals.sagepub.com/