Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Orientation in Three Spheres: Medieval Mediterr...

Electronic data

  • Download

    Rights statement: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=RHT The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Transactions of the Royal Hisotical Society (Sixth Series), 22, pp 37-55 2012, © 2012 Cambridge University Press.

    Final published version, 525 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Orientation in Three Spheres: Medieval Mediterranean Boundary Clauses in Latin, Greek and Arabic

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>12/2012
<mark>Journal</mark>Transactions of the Royal Historical Society
Volume22
Number of pages19
Pages (from-to)37-55
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

This article investigates the development of land registry traditions in the medieval Mediterranean by examining a distinctive aspect of Latin, Greek and Arabic formularies used in boundary clauses. The paper makes particular reference to Islamic and Norman Sicily. The argument begins by recalling that the archetypal way of defining limits according to Classical Roman land surveyors was to begin 'ab oriente'. Many practices from Antiquity were discontinued in the Latin West, but the idea of starting with or from the east endured in many cases where boundaries were assigned cardinal directions. In the Byzantine Empire, the ‘Roman’ model was prescribed and emulated by Greek surveyors and scribes too. But in the Arab-Muslim Mediterranean, lands were defined with the southern limit first. This contrast forms the basis of a typology that can be tested against charter evidence in frontier zones – for example, in twelfth-century Sicily, which had been under Byzantine, Muslim and Norman rulers. It concludes that, under the Normans, private documents drawn up in Arabic began mainly with the southern limit following the ‘Islamic’ model. However, Arabic descriptions of crown lands started mainly in the ‘Romano-Byzantine’ way. These findings offer a higher resolution view of early Norman governance and suggest that such boundary definitions of the royal chancery could not have been based on older ones written in the Islamic period.

Bibliographic note

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=RHT The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Transactions of the Royal Hisotical Society (Sixth Series), 22, pp 37-55 2012, © 2012 Cambridge University Press.