Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A randomised control trial of three pragmatic a...
View graph of relations

A randomised control trial of three pragmatic appraoches to initiate increased physical activity in sedentry patients with risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
  • Paul Little
  • Martina Dorward
  • Sarah Gralton
  • Louise Hammerton
  • John Pillinger
  • Peter White
  • Michael Moore
  • Jim McKenna
  • Sheila Payne
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>03/2004
<mark>Journal</mark>British Journal of General Practice
Issue number500
Volume54
Number of pages7
Pages (from-to)189-195
StatePublished
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical activity is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but it is unclear what combination of feasible approaches, using existing resources in primary care, work best to initiate increased physical activity. AIM: To assess three approaches to initiate increased physical activity. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled (2 X 2 X 2) factorial trial. SETTING: Four general practices. METHOD: One hundred and fifty-one sedentary patients with computer documented risk factors for cardiovascular disease were randomised to eight groups defined by three factors: prescription by general practitioners (GPs) for brisk exercise not requiring a leisure facility (for example, walking) 30 minutes per day, 5 days per week; counselling by practice nurses, based on psychological theory to modify intentions and perceived control of behaviour, and using behavioural implementation techniques (for example, contracting, 'rehearsal'); use of the Health Education Authority booklet 'Getting active, feeling fit'. RESULTS: Single interventions had modest effects. There was a trend from the least intensive interventions (control +/- booklet) to the more intensive interventions (prescription and counselling combined +/- booklet) for both increased physical activity and fitness (test for trend, P = 0.02 and P = 0.05, respectively). Only with the most intense intervention (prescription and counselling combined) were there significant increases in both physical activity and fitness from baseline (Godin score = 14.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.8 to 21, which was equivalent to three 15-minute sessions of brisk exercise and a 6-minute walking distance = 28.5 m, respectively, 95% CI = 11.1 to 45.8). Counselling only made a difference among those individuals with lower intention at baseline. CONCLUSION: Feasible interventions using available staff, which combine exercise prescription and counselling explicitly based on psychological theory, can probably initiate important increases in physical activity.