The resource king is dead! Long live the resource king!
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Published
| <mark>Journal publication date</mark> | 02/1999 |
|---|---|
| <mark>Journal</mark> | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 111-111 |
| Publication Status | Published |
| <mark>Original language</mark> | English |
Abstract
Working memory span forms an important cornerstone of current accounts of cognition, and cognitive development. We describe data that challenge the conventional interpretation of span as a measure of working memory capacity. We argue that the implications of these data undermine the analysis provided by Caplan & Waters concerning the role of working memory in sentence comprehension.
Bibliographic note
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BSS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (1), pp 111-111 1999, © 1999 Cambridge University Press.