Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Human impersonal pronouns in West Germanic

Electronic data

  • Van Olmen & Breed (forthc.) SiL

    Rights statement: This article has been accepted for publication in Studies of Language, Volume 41, Issue 4, 2018, pages: 798-846, © 2018 John Benjamins, the publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use the material in any form.

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.03 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Human impersonal pronouns in West Germanic: A questionnaire-based comparative study of Afrikaans, Dutch and English

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>12/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>Studies in Language
Issue number4
Volume42
Number of pages49
Pages (from-to)798-846
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

In this article, we examine and compare the main human impersonal pronouns in Afrikaans, Dutch and English. The second person singular, the third person plural and the ‘man’- and ‘one’-pronouns are studied by means of an acceptability judgment questionnaire and a completion questionnaire. The combination of the two methods reveals interesting descriptive facts about the three West Germanic languages. They include, among other things, the ‘man’-prominence of Afrikaans versus the ‘you’-prominence of Dutch and English for expressing the universal meaning ‘anyone’ and the more prominent position of ‘they’ in Dutch than in the other languages for conveying the existential meaning ‘someone, some people’. Our findings have a number of more theoretical implications too. The two existing semantic maps for human impersonal pronouns make different distinctions in the existential domain, based on type/level of (un)knownness on the one hand and number on the other. Our study tests both sets of distinctions and shows that the two dimensions interact with each other in Afrikaans, Dutch and English. The results thus support a recent proposal in the literature for a combined semantic map. The data from the completion questionnaire, finally, also indicates that existential uses prefer alternative forms of impersonalization to human impersonal pronouns in all three languages.

Bibliographic note

This article has been accepted for publication in Studies of Language, Volume 41, Issue 4, 2018, pages: 798-846, © 2018 John Benjamins, the publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use the material in any form.