Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Definition and recommendations for advance care...

Electronic data

  • DRAFT white paper ACP Rietjens et al

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in The Lancet Onocology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in The Lancet Oncology, 18, 9, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X

    Accepted author manuscript, 612 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • Judith A C Rietjens
  • Rebecca L Sudore
  • Michael Connolly
  • Johannes J van Delden
  • Margaret A Drickamer
  • Mirjam Droger
  • Agnes van der Heide
  • Daren K Heyland
  • Dirk Houttekier
  • Daisy J A Janssen
  • Luciano Orsi
  • Sheila Payne
  • Jane Seymour
  • Ralf J Jox
  • Ida J Korfage
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>09/2017
<mark>Journal</mark>Lancet Oncology
Issue number9
Volume18
Number of pages9
Pages (from-to)e543-e551
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date1/09/17
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Advance care planning (ACP) is increasingly implemented in oncology and beyond, but a definition of ACP and recommendations concerning its use are lacking. We used a formal Delphi consensus process to help develop a definition of ACP and provide recommendations for its application. Of the 109 experts (82 from Europe, 16 from North America, and 11 from Australia) who rated the ACP definitions and its 41 recommendations, agreement for each definition or recommendation was between 68–100%. ACP was defined as the ability to enable individuals to define goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care, to discuss these goals and preferences with family and health-care providers, and to record and review these preferences if appropriate. Recommendations included the adaptation of ACP based on the readiness of the individual; targeting ACP content as the individual's health condition worsens; and, using trained non-physician facilitators to support the ACP process. We present a list of outcome measures to enable the pooling and comparison of results of ACP studies. We believe that our recommendations can provide guidance for clinical practice, ACP policy, and research.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in The Lancet Onocology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in The Lancet Oncology, 18, 9, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X