Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Polygons, points, or voxels?

Electronic data

  • AestheticsPreferences_Expressive2017

    Rights statement: © ACM, 2017. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version of Record was published in CAE '17 Proceedings of the symposium on Computational Aesthetics http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3092912.3092918

    Accepted author manuscript, 2.79 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Polygons, points, or voxels?: stimuli selection for crowdsourcing aesthetics preferences of 3D shape pairs

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published
Close
Publication date29/07/2017
Host publicationCAE '17 Proceedings of the symposium on Computational Aesthetics
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherACM
Number of pages7
ISBN (print)9781450350808
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Visual aesthetics is one of the fundamental perceptual properties of 3D shapes. Since the perception of shape aesthetics can be subjective, we take a data-driven approach and consider the human preferences of shape aesthetics. Previous work has considered a pairwise data collection approach, in which pairs of 3D shapes are shown to human participants and they are asked to choose one from each pair that they perceive to be more aesthetic. In this research, we study the question of whether the 3D modeling representation (e.g. polygon, points, or voxels) affects how people perceive the aesthetics of shape pairs. We find surprising results: for example the single-view and multi-view of shape pairs lead to similar user aesthetics choices; and a relatively low resolution of points or voxels is comparable to polygon meshes as they do not lead to significantly different user aesthetics choices. Our results has implications towards the data collection process of pairwise aesthetics data and the further use of such data in shape modeling problems.

Bibliographic note

© ACM, 2017. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version of Record was published in CAE '17 Proceedings of the symposium on Computational Aesthetics http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3092912.3092918