Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Borders, Fences, and Limits—Protecting Austria ...

Electronic data

  • Borders final

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies on 20/04/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15562948.2017.1302032

    Accepted author manuscript, 433 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 20/10/18

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Borders, Fences, and Limits—Protecting Austria From Refugees: Metadiscursive Negotiation of Meaning in the Current Refugee Crisis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>2018
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies
Issue number1-2
Volume16
Number of pages24
Pages (from-to)15-38
<mark>State</mark>Published
Early online date20/04/17
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

The so-called refugee crisis presents a field of discursive struggle over meanings in politics. In Austria, mediatized politics in 2015 and 2016 was dominated by metadiscursive negotiation of terminology related to building a border fence and setting a maximum limit on refugees. Both issues raised serious ideological and legal concerns and were thus largely euphemized; as responses to ever-increasing pressure from the political right, however, they were also intended as signals to voters. This article presents a discourse-historical study of the normalization of restrictive policies in the theoretical framework of border and body politics, otherness, and mediatization.

Bibliographic note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies on 20/04/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15562948.2017.1302032