Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > State Transformation and China’s Engagement in ...

Electronic data

  • 2019_4_18_TPR_R2_FILE_NOT_FOR_REVIEW_Copy

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in The Pacific Review on 22 May 2019, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2019.1613441

    Accepted author manuscript, 632 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 22/12/20

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

State Transformation and China’s Engagement in Global Governance: The Case of Nuclear Technologies

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

E-pub ahead of print
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>22/05/2019
<mark>Journal</mark>The Pacific Review
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print
Early online date22/05/19
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Debates over the implications of China’s rise for global governance have reached an impasse, since evidence exists to support both ‘revisionist’ and ‘status-quo’ intentions. This means that neither is strictly falsifiable and hence the debate, as currently structured, is irresolvable. However, contradictions are explicable if we recognise that China is not a unitary state. Since the beginning of the reform era, its international engagements have been shaped by the uneven transformation – fragmentation, decentralisation and internationalisation – of state apparatuses. Contradictory international actions thus may reflect not top-down strategic direction, but conflicts, disagreements and coordination problems within China’s transformed party-state. Our state transformation approach directs us away from evaluating China’s approach to global governance in toto – whether it is overall a revisionist or status quo power – towards a detailed analysis of particular policy domains. This is because in each issue-area we find different constellations of actors and interests, and varying degrees of party-state transformation. We demonstrate the centrality of state transformation analysis for explaining the co-existence of revisionist and status quo behaviours through the apparently hard test case of nuclear technologies. Even in this ‘high politics’ domain, state transformation dynamics help explain China’s inconsistent international behaviours.

Bibliographic note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in The Pacific Review on 22 May 2019, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2019.1613441