Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Argumentation for multi-party privacy management

Electronic data

  • aamas_workshop_2015-js-v4

    Accepted author manuscript, 437 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

View graph of relations

Argumentation for multi-party privacy management

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published
  • Ricard L. Fogues
  • Pradeep Murukanniah
  • Jose M. Such
  • Agustin Espinosa
  • Ana Garcia-Fornes
  • Munindar Singh
Close
Publication date05/2015
Host publicationThe Second International Workshop on Agents and CyberSecurity (ACySe)
Pages3-6
Number of pages4
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Social network services enable users to share large quantities of private information. Often, the shared information concerns individuals who are members of the social network but did not upload the information to the service. In such situations, inappropriate sharing preferences can cause conflict and threaten users’ privacy. Since related studies suggest that users prefer to solve multi-party privacy conflicts through negotiation, we introduce a novel approach based on negotiation through arguments. In our approach, users propose privacy settings and support their proposals with logical arguments. The final decision is based on a setting
supported by sound arguments.