Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Defining the language assessment literacy gap

Electronic data

  • Pill & Harding (2013)

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Language Testing, 30 (3), 2013, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2013 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Language Testing page: http://ltj.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 564 KB, PDF-document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Defining the language assessment literacy gap: evidence from a parliamentary inquiry

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>07/2013
<mark>Journal</mark>Language Testing
Issue number3
Volume30
Number of pages22
Pages (from-to)381-402
<mark>State</mark>Published
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

This study identifies a unique context for exploring lay understandings of language testing, and by extension for characterising the nature of language assessment literacy among non-practitioners, stemming from data in an inquiry into the registration processes and support for overseas trained doctors by the Australian House of Representatives Standing Committee on Health and Ageing. The data come from Hansard transcripts of public hearings of the inquiry. Sections of the data related to language and language testing (as part of the current registration process for doctors seeking employment in Australia) were identified and coded using a thematic analysis. Findings reveal misconceptions about who is responsible for tests and for decisions based on scores in this context, as well as misconceptions about language testing procedures. Issues also emerge concerning the location of expertise in language and language testing. Discussion of these findings contributes to current debate within the language testing community (e.g., Taylor, 2009) about where responsibility lies for increasing language assessment literacy among non-practitioner stakeholders, and how this might best be achieved.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Language Testing, 30 (3), 2013, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2013 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Language Testing page:
http://ltj.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online:
http://online.sagepub.com/