Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Mismatches between industry practice and teachi...
View graph of relations

Mismatches between industry practice and teaching of model-driven software development

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published
Publication date2011
Host publication7th Educators' Symposium@MODELS 2011 Software Modeling in Education Pre-Proceedings
EditorsMarion Brandsteidl, Andreas Winter
Place of PublicationOldenburg
PublisherCarl von Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg
Pages27-30
Number of pages4
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Publication series

NameOldenburg Lecture Notes in Software Engineering
Volume2

Abstract

EAMDE was a 12 month research project, investigating how industry uses
model-driven software development (MDSD). Using quantitative and qualitative research techniques, experiences were collected on the adoption and application of MDSD in 17 companies. The study highlighted examples of good and bad practice that lead to success or failure with MDSD. Some of these practices appear to have ramifications on the way that MDSD, and software modeling more generally, is taught within universities. This paper presents three of the key findings relevant to education: (1) A significant number of successful MDSD companies build their own modeling languages and generators, suggesting a re-orientation of education away from UML notation to fundamental modeling principles; (2) MDSD is generally taught top-down, whereas industry success is
more likely when MDSD is applied bottom-up; (3) successful application of MDSD
requires skills both in abstract modeling and compilers/optimization; however, these skills tend to be separated in standard CS curricula.