Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Comparison of Analytical Techniques for Dynamic...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Comparison of Analytical Techniques for Dynamic Trace Metal Speciation in Natural Freshwaters.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • L. V. Sigg
  • F. Black
  • J. Buffle
  • R. Cleven
  • J. Galceran
  • P. Gunkel
  • E. Kalis
  • D. Kistler
  • M. Michel
  • S. Noel
  • Y. Nur
  • N. Odzak
  • J. Puy
  • W. Van Riemsdijk
  • W. Temminghoff
  • M.-L. Tercier_Waeber
  • S. Toepperwien
  • R. M. Town
  • E. R. Unsworth
  • K. W. Warnken
  • L. Weng
  • H. Xue
  • H. Zhang
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>15/03/2006
<mark>Journal</mark>Environmental Science and Technology
Issue number6
Volume40
Number of pages8
Pages (from-to)1934-1941
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Measurements of trace metal species in situ in a softwater river, a hardwater lake, and a hardwater stream were compared to the equilibrium distribution of species calculated using two models, WHAM 6, incorporating humic ion binding model VI and visual MINTEQ incorporating NICA-Donnan. Diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) and voltammetry at a gel integrated microelectrode (GIME) were used to estimate dynamic species that are both labile and mobile. The Donnan membrane technique (DMT) and hollow fiber permeation liquid membrane (HFPLM) were used to measure free ion activities. Predictions of dominant metal species using the two models agreed reasonably well, even when colloidal oxide components were considered. Concentrations derived using GIME were generally lower than those from DGT, consistent with calculations of the lability criteria that take into account the smaller time window available for the flux to GIME. Model predictions of free ion activities generally did not agree with measurements, highlighting the need for further work and difficulties in obtaining appropriate input data.