Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Martineau, Cobbe, and Teleological Progressivism

Electronic data

  • progress8_final_BJHP_version

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in British Journal for the History of Philosophy on 4 Dec 2020, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09608788.2020.1851650

    Accepted author manuscript, 558 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

  • RBJH_A_1851650_PROOF

    Proof, 2.56 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Martineau, Cobbe, and Teleological Progressivism

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>30/11/2021
<mark>Journal</mark>British Journal for the History of Philosophy
Issue number6
Volume29
Number of pages25
Pages (from-to)1099-1123
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date4/12/20
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

In this paper, I reconstruct the views on historical progress of two nineteenth-century English-speaking philosophical women, Harriet Martineau (1802–76) and Frances Power Cobbe (1822–1904). Martineau and Cobbe put forward theories of progress which I classify as versions of teleological progressivism. Their theories are bound up with their accounts of different world civilizations and religions, and their advancement towards either Christianity, for Cobbe, or through and beyond Christianity towards secularization, for Martineau. After explaining the overall nature of teleological progressivism in the Victorian era and locating Cobbe and Martineau within this intellectual context (Section 1), I turn to the details of Martineau’s version of teleological progressivism (Section 2), then Cobbe’s initial version (Section 3) followed by her second, revised version (Section 4). I then draw out some conclusions about the shared structure of Martineau’s and Cobbe’s forms of teleological progressivism and its complicated connections with Eurocentrism and colonialism (Section 5).

Bibliographic note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in British Journal for the History of Philosophy on 4 Dec 2020, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09608788.2020.1851650