Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A behavioural economic analysis of alcohol, amp...

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A behavioural economic analysis of alcohol, amphetamine, cocaine and ecstasy purchases by polysubstance misusers

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A behavioural economic analysis of alcohol, amphetamine, cocaine and ecstasy purchases by polysubstance misusers. / Sumnall, Harry; Tyler, Elizabeth; Wagstaff, Graham F. et al.
In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 76, No. 1, 2004, p. 93-99.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sumnall H, Tyler E, Wagstaff GF, Cole J. A behavioural economic analysis of alcohol, amphetamine, cocaine and ecstasy purchases by polysubstance misusers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2004;76(1):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.04.006

Author

Sumnall, Harry ; Tyler, Elizabeth ; Wagstaff, Graham F. et al. / A behavioural economic analysis of alcohol, amphetamine, cocaine and ecstasy purchases by polysubstance misusers. In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2004 ; Vol. 76, No. 1. pp. 93-99.

Bibtex

@article{3d7b546a9f884025b328d0b2516481e4,
title = "A behavioural economic analysis of alcohol, amphetamine, cocaine and ecstasy purchases by polysubstance misusers",
abstract = "Behavioural economic models of substance choice describe the relationship between changes in unit price and consumption. As the majority of UK non-dependent substance misusers are polysubstance misusers, we investigated the influence of price upon hypothetical purchases of alcohol, amphetamine, cocaine and ecstasy. Forty-three current polysubstance misusers (25 males, 18 females; mean age 21.3 ± 2.8) were recruited into the study. As the price of alcohol rose, demand was inelastic. Amphetamine was a substitute for alcohol, cocaine was a compliment drug and ecstasy was independent. Demand for amphetamine was elastic as its price rose, but only alcohol was identified as a substitute drug and other drug purchases were independent of amphetamine price. As the price of cocaine increased, demand was elastic. Alcohol and ecstasy were substitute drugs but amphetamine purchase was independent, indicating asymmetrical substitution of alcohol and cocaine. Finally, demand for ecstasy was also elastic, but only cocaine substituted as ecstasy price rose. These results extend previous findings in substance dependent populations using behavioural economic models and support the opinion that purchasing substances is a complex process, involving both socio-economic and psychopharmacological factors. Whilst subjects expressed a preference for ecstasy, these behavioural findings indicated that alcohol was their drug of choice when economic considerations were brought into play. Self-reported drug preference, although facilitating between subjects experimental design, may therefore not accurately represent real world polysubstance misuse.",
keywords = "Polysubstance misuse, Alcohol, Amphetamine, Cocaine, Ecstasy, Behavioural economics",
author = "Harry Sumnall and Elizabeth Tyler and Wagstaff, {Graham F.} and Jon Cole",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.04.006",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "93--99",
journal = "Drug and Alcohol Dependence",
issn = "0376-8716",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A behavioural economic analysis of alcohol, amphetamine, cocaine and ecstasy purchases by polysubstance misusers

AU - Sumnall, Harry

AU - Tyler, Elizabeth

AU - Wagstaff, Graham F.

AU - Cole, Jon

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Behavioural economic models of substance choice describe the relationship between changes in unit price and consumption. As the majority of UK non-dependent substance misusers are polysubstance misusers, we investigated the influence of price upon hypothetical purchases of alcohol, amphetamine, cocaine and ecstasy. Forty-three current polysubstance misusers (25 males, 18 females; mean age 21.3 ± 2.8) were recruited into the study. As the price of alcohol rose, demand was inelastic. Amphetamine was a substitute for alcohol, cocaine was a compliment drug and ecstasy was independent. Demand for amphetamine was elastic as its price rose, but only alcohol was identified as a substitute drug and other drug purchases were independent of amphetamine price. As the price of cocaine increased, demand was elastic. Alcohol and ecstasy were substitute drugs but amphetamine purchase was independent, indicating asymmetrical substitution of alcohol and cocaine. Finally, demand for ecstasy was also elastic, but only cocaine substituted as ecstasy price rose. These results extend previous findings in substance dependent populations using behavioural economic models and support the opinion that purchasing substances is a complex process, involving both socio-economic and psychopharmacological factors. Whilst subjects expressed a preference for ecstasy, these behavioural findings indicated that alcohol was their drug of choice when economic considerations were brought into play. Self-reported drug preference, although facilitating between subjects experimental design, may therefore not accurately represent real world polysubstance misuse.

AB - Behavioural economic models of substance choice describe the relationship between changes in unit price and consumption. As the majority of UK non-dependent substance misusers are polysubstance misusers, we investigated the influence of price upon hypothetical purchases of alcohol, amphetamine, cocaine and ecstasy. Forty-three current polysubstance misusers (25 males, 18 females; mean age 21.3 ± 2.8) were recruited into the study. As the price of alcohol rose, demand was inelastic. Amphetamine was a substitute for alcohol, cocaine was a compliment drug and ecstasy was independent. Demand for amphetamine was elastic as its price rose, but only alcohol was identified as a substitute drug and other drug purchases were independent of amphetamine price. As the price of cocaine increased, demand was elastic. Alcohol and ecstasy were substitute drugs but amphetamine purchase was independent, indicating asymmetrical substitution of alcohol and cocaine. Finally, demand for ecstasy was also elastic, but only cocaine substituted as ecstasy price rose. These results extend previous findings in substance dependent populations using behavioural economic models and support the opinion that purchasing substances is a complex process, involving both socio-economic and psychopharmacological factors. Whilst subjects expressed a preference for ecstasy, these behavioural findings indicated that alcohol was their drug of choice when economic considerations were brought into play. Self-reported drug preference, although facilitating between subjects experimental design, may therefore not accurately represent real world polysubstance misuse.

KW - Polysubstance misuse

KW - Alcohol

KW - Amphetamine

KW - Cocaine

KW - Ecstasy

KW - Behavioural economics

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.04.006

DO - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.04.006

M3 - Journal article

VL - 76

SP - 93

EP - 99

JO - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

JF - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

SN - 0376-8716

IS - 1

ER -