Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondenc...

Research

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN › Conference paper › peer-review

Published

Standard

A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains. / Walker, Laura; Walker, Peter; Francis, Brian.
2012. 67-67.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN › Conference paper › peer-review

Harvard

Walker, L, Walker, P & Francis, B 2012, 'A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains', pp. 67-67.

APA

Walker, L., Walker, P., & Francis, B. (2012). A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains. 67-67.

Vancouver

Walker L, Walker P, Francis B. A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains. 2012.

Author

Walker, Laura ; Walker, Peter ; Francis, Brian. / A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains. 1 p.

Bibtex

@conference{2fab1d49c1104d2cb7388c262c4f8979,
title = "A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains",
abstract = "Following Karwoski, Odbert, and Osgood (1942), it is proposed that cross-sensory correspondences can arise from extensive, bi-directional cross-activation between dimensions of connotative meaning. If this account is correct, the same set of cross-sensory correspondences (e.g., smallness with brightness, brightness with high pitch, high pitch with sharpness) should emerge regardless of the sensory channel (visual, auditory, or tactile) that is probed. To test this prediction, participants rated a range of visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli on a series of rating scales relating to different dimensions of connotative meaning. The same set of cross-sensory correspondences emerged from all types of stimulus variation. This supports the suggestion that cross-sensory correspondences can reflect reciprocal interactions between dimensions of connotative meaning, and indicates that Spence{\textquoteright}s (2011) theoretical framework might be usefully extended to include semantically-based correspondences.",
author = "Laura Walker and Peter Walker and Brian Francis",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
pages = "67--67",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains

AU - Walker, Laura

AU - Walker, Peter

AU - Francis, Brian

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Following Karwoski, Odbert, and Osgood (1942), it is proposed that cross-sensory correspondences can arise from extensive, bi-directional cross-activation between dimensions of connotative meaning. If this account is correct, the same set of cross-sensory correspondences (e.g., smallness with brightness, brightness with high pitch, high pitch with sharpness) should emerge regardless of the sensory channel (visual, auditory, or tactile) that is probed. To test this prediction, participants rated a range of visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli on a series of rating scales relating to different dimensions of connotative meaning. The same set of cross-sensory correspondences emerged from all types of stimulus variation. This supports the suggestion that cross-sensory correspondences can reflect reciprocal interactions between dimensions of connotative meaning, and indicates that Spence’s (2011) theoretical framework might be usefully extended to include semantically-based correspondences.

AB - Following Karwoski, Odbert, and Osgood (1942), it is proposed that cross-sensory correspondences can arise from extensive, bi-directional cross-activation between dimensions of connotative meaning. If this account is correct, the same set of cross-sensory correspondences (e.g., smallness with brightness, brightness with high pitch, high pitch with sharpness) should emerge regardless of the sensory channel (visual, auditory, or tactile) that is probed. To test this prediction, participants rated a range of visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli on a series of rating scales relating to different dimensions of connotative meaning. The same set of cross-sensory correspondences emerged from all types of stimulus variation. This supports the suggestion that cross-sensory correspondences can reflect reciprocal interactions between dimensions of connotative meaning, and indicates that Spence’s (2011) theoretical framework might be usefully extended to include semantically-based correspondences.

M3 - Conference paper

SP - 67

EP - 67

ER -