Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A comparative review of palliative care develop...
View graph of relations

A comparative review of palliative care development in six countries represented by the Middle East Cancer Consortium (MECC)

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A comparative review of palliative care development in six countries represented by the Middle East Cancer Consortium (MECC). / Bingley, Amanda.
In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 37, No. 3, 03.2009, p. 287-296.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bingley A. A comparative review of palliative care development in six countries represented by the Middle East Cancer Consortium (MECC). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2009 Mar;37(3):287-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.02.014

Author

Bibtex

@article{1d315b52bffd4393b44d49aebadc0891,
title = "A comparative review of palliative care development in six countries represented by the Middle East Cancer Consortium (MECC)",
abstract = "Palliative care development and services were reviewed in the region represented by the six members of the Middle East Cancer Consortium: Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, and Turkey. The multimethod review synthesized evidence from ethnographic field visits to inpatient units, home care hospice teams and free-standing hospices, including interviews with hospice and palliative care clinicians, administrators, volunteers, policy makers and academic researchers. Public health data and relevant literature were collated together with internet-accessed information on services and health care systems. A total of 69 services were located; two country members have a history of relatively sustained development of hospice and palliative care, but provision across the Middle East Cancer Consortium region is highly variable at a local level. Considerable barriers to service development were identified in a region already struggling with many military and political conflicts. Key problems are a lack of secure funds and government support, inadequate professional training programs, opioid phobia in professionals and the public, and a lack of awareness and understanding of palliative care needs at public, government, and professional levels. Key areas for further attention were increasing national and international professional training and public education programs, improving opioid legislation and health care policies, negotiating for secure government or health insurance funding provision, raising awareness about the need for pediatric services and for patients with other illnesses, as well as for those with cancer, and working to integrate palliative care into mainstream health service provision and education.",
keywords = "Palliative care development, Middle East",
author = "Amanda Bingley",
year = "2009",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.02.014",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "287--296",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative review of palliative care development in six countries represented by the Middle East Cancer Consortium (MECC)

AU - Bingley, Amanda

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Palliative care development and services were reviewed in the region represented by the six members of the Middle East Cancer Consortium: Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, and Turkey. The multimethod review synthesized evidence from ethnographic field visits to inpatient units, home care hospice teams and free-standing hospices, including interviews with hospice and palliative care clinicians, administrators, volunteers, policy makers and academic researchers. Public health data and relevant literature were collated together with internet-accessed information on services and health care systems. A total of 69 services were located; two country members have a history of relatively sustained development of hospice and palliative care, but provision across the Middle East Cancer Consortium region is highly variable at a local level. Considerable barriers to service development were identified in a region already struggling with many military and political conflicts. Key problems are a lack of secure funds and government support, inadequate professional training programs, opioid phobia in professionals and the public, and a lack of awareness and understanding of palliative care needs at public, government, and professional levels. Key areas for further attention were increasing national and international professional training and public education programs, improving opioid legislation and health care policies, negotiating for secure government or health insurance funding provision, raising awareness about the need for pediatric services and for patients with other illnesses, as well as for those with cancer, and working to integrate palliative care into mainstream health service provision and education.

AB - Palliative care development and services were reviewed in the region represented by the six members of the Middle East Cancer Consortium: Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, and Turkey. The multimethod review synthesized evidence from ethnographic field visits to inpatient units, home care hospice teams and free-standing hospices, including interviews with hospice and palliative care clinicians, administrators, volunteers, policy makers and academic researchers. Public health data and relevant literature were collated together with internet-accessed information on services and health care systems. A total of 69 services were located; two country members have a history of relatively sustained development of hospice and palliative care, but provision across the Middle East Cancer Consortium region is highly variable at a local level. Considerable barriers to service development were identified in a region already struggling with many military and political conflicts. Key problems are a lack of secure funds and government support, inadequate professional training programs, opioid phobia in professionals and the public, and a lack of awareness and understanding of palliative care needs at public, government, and professional levels. Key areas for further attention were increasing national and international professional training and public education programs, improving opioid legislation and health care policies, negotiating for secure government or health insurance funding provision, raising awareness about the need for pediatric services and for patients with other illnesses, as well as for those with cancer, and working to integrate palliative care into mainstream health service provision and education.

KW - Palliative care development

KW - Middle East

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61349174595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.02.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.02.014

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:61349174595

VL - 37

SP - 287

EP - 296

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 3

ER -