Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A Comparative Study of DECT and WLAN Signals fo...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A Comparative Study of DECT and WLAN Signals for Indoor Localization

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

A Comparative Study of DECT and WLAN Signals for Indoor Localization. / Kranz, Matthias; Fischer, Carl; Schmidt, Albrecht.
IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), 2010. IEEE, 2010. p. 235-243.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

Kranz, M, Fischer, C & Schmidt, A 2010, A Comparative Study of DECT and WLAN Signals for Indoor Localization. in IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), 2010. IEEE, pp. 235-243, 8th Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (Percom 2010), 1/01/00. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2010.5466970

APA

Kranz, M., Fischer, C., & Schmidt, A. (2010). A Comparative Study of DECT and WLAN Signals for Indoor Localization. In IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), 2010 (pp. 235-243). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2010.5466970

Vancouver

Kranz M, Fischer C, Schmidt A. A Comparative Study of DECT and WLAN Signals for Indoor Localization. In IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), 2010. IEEE. 2010. p. 235-243 doi: 10.1109/PERCOM.2010.5466970

Author

Kranz, Matthias ; Fischer, Carl ; Schmidt, Albrecht. / A Comparative Study of DECT and WLAN Signals for Indoor Localization. IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), 2010. IEEE, 2010. pp. 235-243

Bibtex

@inproceedings{152b203f53c24e5e87d41b26bcaeba3c,
title = "A Comparative Study of DECT and WLAN Signals for Indoor Localization",
abstract = "While there is more to context than location, localization and positioning must continue to be improved. Location-aware applications, such as Google Latitude, are enjoying great popularity. Location-based applications and services are widely used on platforms such as the iPhone. The localization itself thus remains an issue, especially in indoor scenarios. In this paper we discuss Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT) and its potential for positioning and localization. While the technology itself is not new, the application of DECT for localization has so far not been thoroughly investigated, especially for combined indoor and outdoor usage. We have collected and analyzed large data sets of DECT and WLAN fingerprints in urban, sub-urban and rural areas, both for indoor and outdoor situations. We show that DECT could improve the accuracy and robustness of existing localization schemes based on WLAN or GSM",
author = "Matthias Kranz and Carl Fischer and Albrecht Schmidt",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1109/PERCOM.2010.5466970",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-4244-5329-0",
pages = "235--243",
booktitle = "IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), 2010",
publisher = "IEEE",
note = "8th Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (Percom 2010) ; Conference date: 01-01-1900",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - A Comparative Study of DECT and WLAN Signals for Indoor Localization

AU - Kranz, Matthias

AU - Fischer, Carl

AU - Schmidt, Albrecht

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - While there is more to context than location, localization and positioning must continue to be improved. Location-aware applications, such as Google Latitude, are enjoying great popularity. Location-based applications and services are widely used on platforms such as the iPhone. The localization itself thus remains an issue, especially in indoor scenarios. In this paper we discuss Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT) and its potential for positioning and localization. While the technology itself is not new, the application of DECT for localization has so far not been thoroughly investigated, especially for combined indoor and outdoor usage. We have collected and analyzed large data sets of DECT and WLAN fingerprints in urban, sub-urban and rural areas, both for indoor and outdoor situations. We show that DECT could improve the accuracy and robustness of existing localization schemes based on WLAN or GSM

AB - While there is more to context than location, localization and positioning must continue to be improved. Location-aware applications, such as Google Latitude, are enjoying great popularity. Location-based applications and services are widely used on platforms such as the iPhone. The localization itself thus remains an issue, especially in indoor scenarios. In this paper we discuss Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT) and its potential for positioning and localization. While the technology itself is not new, the application of DECT for localization has so far not been thoroughly investigated, especially for combined indoor and outdoor usage. We have collected and analyzed large data sets of DECT and WLAN fingerprints in urban, sub-urban and rural areas, both for indoor and outdoor situations. We show that DECT could improve the accuracy and robustness of existing localization schemes based on WLAN or GSM

U2 - 10.1109/PERCOM.2010.5466970

DO - 10.1109/PERCOM.2010.5466970

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

SN - 978-1-4244-5329-0

SP - 235

EP - 243

BT - IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), 2010

PB - IEEE

T2 - 8th Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (Percom 2010)

Y2 - 1 January 1900

ER -