We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK


97% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A comparison of heuristic and human performance...
View graph of relations

« Back

A comparison of heuristic and human performance on open versions of the traveling salesperson problem.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article


Associated organisational unit

<mark>Journal publication date</mark>2006
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Problem Solving
Number of pages11
<mark>Original language</mark>English


We compared the performance of three heuristics with that of subjects on variants of a well-known combinatorial optimization task, the Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP). The present task consisted of finding the shortest path through an array of points from one side of the array to the other. Like the standard TSP, the task is computationally intractable and, as with the standard TSP, people appear to be able to find good solutions with relative ease. The three heuristics used mechanisms that have been cited as potentially relevant in human performance in the standard task. These were: convex hull, nearest neighbor, and crossing avoidance. We compared heuristic and human performance in terms of lengths of paths, overlap between solutions, and number of crossings. Of the three heuristics, the convex hull appeared to result in the best overall fit with human solutions.