Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A comparison of modeled auroral boundaries with...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • AGU15_Case

    Final published version, 0.99 MB, PDF document

Links

View graph of relations

A comparison of modeled auroral boundaries with observations from citizen scientists

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Abstract

Published

Standard

A comparison of modeled auroral boundaries with observations from citizen scientists. / Case, Nathan; MacDonald, Elizabeth ; Viereck, Rodney.
2015. Abstract from AGU Fall Meeting 2015, San Francisco, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Abstract

Harvard

Case, N, MacDonald, E & Viereck, R 2015, 'A comparison of modeled auroral boundaries with observations from citizen scientists', AGU Fall Meeting 2015, San Francisco, United States, 14/12/15 - 18/12/15. <https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm15/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/82676>

APA

Case, N., MacDonald, E., & Viereck, R. (2015). A comparison of modeled auroral boundaries with observations from citizen scientists. Abstract from AGU Fall Meeting 2015, San Francisco, United States. https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm15/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/82676

Vancouver

Case N, MacDonald E, Viereck R. A comparison of modeled auroral boundaries with observations from citizen scientists. 2015. Abstract from AGU Fall Meeting 2015, San Francisco, United States.

Author

Case, Nathan ; MacDonald, Elizabeth ; Viereck, Rodney. / A comparison of modeled auroral boundaries with observations from citizen scientists. Abstract from AGU Fall Meeting 2015, San Francisco, United States.

Bibtex

@conference{a3c72a3e988c4c72bd4d57fd588f2ca2,
title = "A comparison of modeled auroral boundaries with observations from citizen scientists",
abstract = "Over the past year, the citizen science project Aurorasaurus has collected new, globally-distributed, ground-based observations of the aurora and has integrated them with space-based estimates of auroral activity. A case study of these observations were compared to the OVATION Prime model of aurora, run by the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC). The observations were comprised of positive and negative sightings directly reported to Aurorasaurus, along with verified tweets, which are positive sightings reported on Twitter and verified by Aurorasaurus users. The observations were collected during March and April 2015, a period spanning three large geomagnetic storms, and covered a wide range of latitudes. The observations demonstrated that, during these events, over 60% of the positive aurora observations (which includes those reported directly to Aurorasaurus and the verified tweets) occurred at latitudes equatorward of the SWPC predicted {"}view line{"}. New scaling parameters were determined from the relationship of the differences in latitude between the positive observations and the view line, and the maximum probability of visible aurora. Future work testing these scaling parameters and using them in the Aurorasaurus real-time alert system will be presented.",
author = "Nathan Case and Elizabeth MacDonald and Rodney Viereck",
year = "2015",
month = dec,
day = "18",
language = "English",
note = "AGU Fall Meeting 2015 ; Conference date: 14-12-2015 Through 18-12-2015",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - A comparison of modeled auroral boundaries with observations from citizen scientists

AU - Case, Nathan

AU - MacDonald, Elizabeth

AU - Viereck, Rodney

PY - 2015/12/18

Y1 - 2015/12/18

N2 - Over the past year, the citizen science project Aurorasaurus has collected new, globally-distributed, ground-based observations of the aurora and has integrated them with space-based estimates of auroral activity. A case study of these observations were compared to the OVATION Prime model of aurora, run by the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC). The observations were comprised of positive and negative sightings directly reported to Aurorasaurus, along with verified tweets, which are positive sightings reported on Twitter and verified by Aurorasaurus users. The observations were collected during March and April 2015, a period spanning three large geomagnetic storms, and covered a wide range of latitudes. The observations demonstrated that, during these events, over 60% of the positive aurora observations (which includes those reported directly to Aurorasaurus and the verified tweets) occurred at latitudes equatorward of the SWPC predicted "view line". New scaling parameters were determined from the relationship of the differences in latitude between the positive observations and the view line, and the maximum probability of visible aurora. Future work testing these scaling parameters and using them in the Aurorasaurus real-time alert system will be presented.

AB - Over the past year, the citizen science project Aurorasaurus has collected new, globally-distributed, ground-based observations of the aurora and has integrated them with space-based estimates of auroral activity. A case study of these observations were compared to the OVATION Prime model of aurora, run by the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC). The observations were comprised of positive and negative sightings directly reported to Aurorasaurus, along with verified tweets, which are positive sightings reported on Twitter and verified by Aurorasaurus users. The observations were collected during March and April 2015, a period spanning three large geomagnetic storms, and covered a wide range of latitudes. The observations demonstrated that, during these events, over 60% of the positive aurora observations (which includes those reported directly to Aurorasaurus and the verified tweets) occurred at latitudes equatorward of the SWPC predicted "view line". New scaling parameters were determined from the relationship of the differences in latitude between the positive observations and the view line, and the maximum probability of visible aurora. Future work testing these scaling parameters and using them in the Aurorasaurus real-time alert system will be presented.

M3 - Abstract

T2 - AGU Fall Meeting 2015

Y2 - 14 December 2015 through 18 December 2015

ER -