Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A Cultural Political Economy of Research and In...
View graph of relations

A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis. / Tyfield, David.
In: Minerva, Vol. 50, No. 2, 06.2012, p. 149-167.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Tyfield D. A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis. Minerva. 2012 Jun;50(2):149-167. doi: 10.1007/s11024-012-9201-y

Author

Bibtex

@article{8b82481d7a6a4ce2a2b31770fd9e8a0c,
title = "A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis",
abstract = "Science and technology policy is both faced by unprecedented challenges and itself undergoing seismic shifts. First, policy is increasingly demanding of science that it fixes a set of epochal and global crises. On the other hand, practices of scientific research are changing rapidly regarding geographical dispersion, the institutions and identities of those involved and its forms of knowledge production and circulation. Furthermore, these changes are accelerated by the current upheavals in public funding of research, higher education and technology development in the wake of the economic crisis. The paper outlines an agenda for science & technology policy studies in terms of a research programme of a {\textquoteleft}cultural political economy of research and innovation{\textquoteright} (CPERI). First, the implications of the overlapping crises for science policy analysis are discussed. Secondly, three rough constellations of contemporary approaches to science policy are critically compared, namely: a techno-statist Keynesian governance; a neoliberal marketplace of ideas; and co-productionist enabling of democratic debate. CPERI is then introduced, showing how it builds on the strengths of co-production while also specifically targeting two major weaknesses that are of heightened importance in an age of multiple crises, namely neglect of political economy and the concept of power.",
keywords = "Science & Technology Policy, Crisis, cultural political economy, Governmentality",
author = "David Tyfield",
year = "2012",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1007/s11024-012-9201-y",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "149--167",
journal = "Minerva",
issn = "0026-4695",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis

AU - Tyfield, David

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Science and technology policy is both faced by unprecedented challenges and itself undergoing seismic shifts. First, policy is increasingly demanding of science that it fixes a set of epochal and global crises. On the other hand, practices of scientific research are changing rapidly regarding geographical dispersion, the institutions and identities of those involved and its forms of knowledge production and circulation. Furthermore, these changes are accelerated by the current upheavals in public funding of research, higher education and technology development in the wake of the economic crisis. The paper outlines an agenda for science & technology policy studies in terms of a research programme of a ‘cultural political economy of research and innovation’ (CPERI). First, the implications of the overlapping crises for science policy analysis are discussed. Secondly, three rough constellations of contemporary approaches to science policy are critically compared, namely: a techno-statist Keynesian governance; a neoliberal marketplace of ideas; and co-productionist enabling of democratic debate. CPERI is then introduced, showing how it builds on the strengths of co-production while also specifically targeting two major weaknesses that are of heightened importance in an age of multiple crises, namely neglect of political economy and the concept of power.

AB - Science and technology policy is both faced by unprecedented challenges and itself undergoing seismic shifts. First, policy is increasingly demanding of science that it fixes a set of epochal and global crises. On the other hand, practices of scientific research are changing rapidly regarding geographical dispersion, the institutions and identities of those involved and its forms of knowledge production and circulation. Furthermore, these changes are accelerated by the current upheavals in public funding of research, higher education and technology development in the wake of the economic crisis. The paper outlines an agenda for science & technology policy studies in terms of a research programme of a ‘cultural political economy of research and innovation’ (CPERI). First, the implications of the overlapping crises for science policy analysis are discussed. Secondly, three rough constellations of contemporary approaches to science policy are critically compared, namely: a techno-statist Keynesian governance; a neoliberal marketplace of ideas; and co-productionist enabling of democratic debate. CPERI is then introduced, showing how it builds on the strengths of co-production while also specifically targeting two major weaknesses that are of heightened importance in an age of multiple crises, namely neglect of political economy and the concept of power.

KW - Science & Technology Policy

KW - Crisis

KW - cultural political economy

KW - Governmentality

U2 - 10.1007/s11024-012-9201-y

DO - 10.1007/s11024-012-9201-y

M3 - Journal article

VL - 50

SP - 149

EP - 167

JO - Minerva

JF - Minerva

SN - 0026-4695

IS - 2

ER -