Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A detrital record of the Nile River and its cat...

Electronic data

  • Fielding_et_al_text_revised_FINAL (3)

    Accepted author manuscript, 802 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A detrital record of the Nile River and its catchment

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A detrital record of the Nile River and its catchment. / Fielding, Laura; Najman, Yanina Manya Rachel; Millar, Ian et al.
In: Journal of the Geological Society, Vol. 174, No. 2, 03.2017, p. 301-317.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Fielding, L, Najman, YMR, Millar, I, Butterworth, P, Ando, S, Padoan, M, Barfod, D & Kneller, B 2017, 'A detrital record of the Nile River and its catchment', Journal of the Geological Society, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2016-075

APA

Fielding, L., Najman, Y. M. R., Millar, I., Butterworth, P., Ando, S., Padoan, M., Barfod, D., & Kneller, B. (2017). A detrital record of the Nile River and its catchment. Journal of the Geological Society, 174(2), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2016-075

Vancouver

Fielding L, Najman YMR, Millar I, Butterworth P, Ando S, Padoan M et al. A detrital record of the Nile River and its catchment. Journal of the Geological Society. 2017 Mar;174(2):301-317. Epub 2016 Dec 7. doi: 10.1144/jgs2016-075

Author

Fielding, Laura ; Najman, Yanina Manya Rachel ; Millar, Ian et al. / A detrital record of the Nile River and its catchment. In: Journal of the Geological Society. 2017 ; Vol. 174, No. 2. pp. 301-317.

Bibtex

@article{5c0640ec56cf4efd9aff88aceaaf6303,
title = "A detrital record of the Nile River and its catchment",
abstract = "This research uses analyses from Nile catchment rivers, wadis, dunes and bedrocks to constrain the geological history of NE Africa and document influences on the composition of sediment reaching the Nile delta. Our data show evolution of the North African crust, highlighting phases in the development of the Arabian-Nubian Shield and amalgamation of Gondwana in Neoproterozoic times. The Saharan Metacraton and Congo Craton in Uganda have a common history of crustal growth, with new crust formation at 3.0-3.5 Ga, and crustal melting at c.2.7 Ga. The Hammamat Formation of the Arabian-Nubian Shield is locally-derived and has a maximum depositional age of 635 Ma. By contrast, Phanerozoic sedimentary rocks are derived from more distant sources. The fine-grained (mud) bulk signature of the modern Nile is dominated by input from the Ethiopian Highlands, transported by the Blue Nile and Atbara rivers. Detrital zircons in the Nile trunk are predominantly derived from Phanerozoic cover rocks. Most detritus from the upstream White Nile is trapped in the Sudd marshes and contributes little to the Nile trunk. Therefore, the White Nile downstream is dominated by locally-derived Phanerozoic cover. The White Nile proximal to the Gezira Fan is influenced by the fan{\textquoteright}s Blue Nile signature. ",
author = "Laura Fielding and Najman, {Yanina Manya Rachel} and Ian Millar and Peter Butterworth and Sergio Ando and Marta Padoan and Dan Barfod and Ben Kneller",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1144/jgs2016-075",
language = "English",
volume = "174",
pages = "301--317",
journal = "Journal of the Geological Society",
issn = "0016-7649",
publisher = "Geological Society of London",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A detrital record of the Nile River and its catchment

AU - Fielding, Laura

AU - Najman, Yanina Manya Rachel

AU - Millar, Ian

AU - Butterworth, Peter

AU - Ando, Sergio

AU - Padoan, Marta

AU - Barfod, Dan

AU - Kneller, Ben

PY - 2017/3

Y1 - 2017/3

N2 - This research uses analyses from Nile catchment rivers, wadis, dunes and bedrocks to constrain the geological history of NE Africa and document influences on the composition of sediment reaching the Nile delta. Our data show evolution of the North African crust, highlighting phases in the development of the Arabian-Nubian Shield and amalgamation of Gondwana in Neoproterozoic times. The Saharan Metacraton and Congo Craton in Uganda have a common history of crustal growth, with new crust formation at 3.0-3.5 Ga, and crustal melting at c.2.7 Ga. The Hammamat Formation of the Arabian-Nubian Shield is locally-derived and has a maximum depositional age of 635 Ma. By contrast, Phanerozoic sedimentary rocks are derived from more distant sources. The fine-grained (mud) bulk signature of the modern Nile is dominated by input from the Ethiopian Highlands, transported by the Blue Nile and Atbara rivers. Detrital zircons in the Nile trunk are predominantly derived from Phanerozoic cover rocks. Most detritus from the upstream White Nile is trapped in the Sudd marshes and contributes little to the Nile trunk. Therefore, the White Nile downstream is dominated by locally-derived Phanerozoic cover. The White Nile proximal to the Gezira Fan is influenced by the fan’s Blue Nile signature.

AB - This research uses analyses from Nile catchment rivers, wadis, dunes and bedrocks to constrain the geological history of NE Africa and document influences on the composition of sediment reaching the Nile delta. Our data show evolution of the North African crust, highlighting phases in the development of the Arabian-Nubian Shield and amalgamation of Gondwana in Neoproterozoic times. The Saharan Metacraton and Congo Craton in Uganda have a common history of crustal growth, with new crust formation at 3.0-3.5 Ga, and crustal melting at c.2.7 Ga. The Hammamat Formation of the Arabian-Nubian Shield is locally-derived and has a maximum depositional age of 635 Ma. By contrast, Phanerozoic sedimentary rocks are derived from more distant sources. The fine-grained (mud) bulk signature of the modern Nile is dominated by input from the Ethiopian Highlands, transported by the Blue Nile and Atbara rivers. Detrital zircons in the Nile trunk are predominantly derived from Phanerozoic cover rocks. Most detritus from the upstream White Nile is trapped in the Sudd marshes and contributes little to the Nile trunk. Therefore, the White Nile downstream is dominated by locally-derived Phanerozoic cover. The White Nile proximal to the Gezira Fan is influenced by the fan’s Blue Nile signature.

U2 - 10.1144/jgs2016-075

DO - 10.1144/jgs2016-075

M3 - Journal article

VL - 174

SP - 301

EP - 317

JO - Journal of the Geological Society

JF - Journal of the Geological Society

SN - 0016-7649

IS - 2

ER -