Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A meta analysis of spray drift sampling

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

A meta analysis of spray drift sampling

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

A meta analysis of spray drift sampling. / Donkersley, P.; Nuyttens, D.
In: Crop Protection, Vol. 30, No. 7, 07.2011, p. 931-936.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Donkersley, P & Nuyttens, D 2011, 'A meta analysis of spray drift sampling', Crop Protection, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 931-936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.03.020

APA

Donkersley, P., & Nuyttens, D. (2011). A meta analysis of spray drift sampling. Crop Protection, 30(7), 931-936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.03.020

Vancouver

Donkersley P, Nuyttens D. A meta analysis of spray drift sampling. Crop Protection. 2011 Jul;30(7):931-936. Epub 2011 Apr 13. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.03.020

Author

Donkersley, P. ; Nuyttens, D. / A meta analysis of spray drift sampling. In: Crop Protection. 2011 ; Vol. 30, No. 7. pp. 931-936.

Bibtex

@article{aff71a46f70446a0903b77b8579629c0,
title = "A meta analysis of spray drift sampling",
abstract = "There are many methods available for sampling spray drift, and a great variety of estimates of spray drift have been published. Available data on spray drift were collected from different studies and the measurements of spray drift were analysed to determine similarities and differences between the individual studies. Each of the methods varied significantly in their estimates of spray drift. This variation was due to many factors that differed between the published sources, such as environmental conditions, cropping system, equipment used and the tracer used. It is suggested that in order to compare drift measurements between published studies, measurement techniques and sampling distances must be standardised, and environmental conditions (humidity and temperature) should be restricted to within certain boundaries in the field, and controlled within artificial tests, unless, of course, the effect of this variable on drift is being examined. ",
keywords = "Eco-toxicology, Field, Meta-analysis, Orchard, PDPA laser analysis, Pesticide fate, Spray drift, Wind tunnel",
author = "P. Donkersley and D. Nuyttens",
year = "2011",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.cropro.2011.03.020",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "931--936",
journal = "Crop Protection",
issn = "0261-2194",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta analysis of spray drift sampling

AU - Donkersley, P.

AU - Nuyttens, D.

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - There are many methods available for sampling spray drift, and a great variety of estimates of spray drift have been published. Available data on spray drift were collected from different studies and the measurements of spray drift were analysed to determine similarities and differences between the individual studies. Each of the methods varied significantly in their estimates of spray drift. This variation was due to many factors that differed between the published sources, such as environmental conditions, cropping system, equipment used and the tracer used. It is suggested that in order to compare drift measurements between published studies, measurement techniques and sampling distances must be standardised, and environmental conditions (humidity and temperature) should be restricted to within certain boundaries in the field, and controlled within artificial tests, unless, of course, the effect of this variable on drift is being examined.

AB - There are many methods available for sampling spray drift, and a great variety of estimates of spray drift have been published. Available data on spray drift were collected from different studies and the measurements of spray drift were analysed to determine similarities and differences between the individual studies. Each of the methods varied significantly in their estimates of spray drift. This variation was due to many factors that differed between the published sources, such as environmental conditions, cropping system, equipment used and the tracer used. It is suggested that in order to compare drift measurements between published studies, measurement techniques and sampling distances must be standardised, and environmental conditions (humidity and temperature) should be restricted to within certain boundaries in the field, and controlled within artificial tests, unless, of course, the effect of this variable on drift is being examined.

KW - Eco-toxicology

KW - Field

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Orchard

KW - PDPA laser analysis

KW - Pesticide fate

KW - Spray drift

KW - Wind tunnel

U2 - 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.03.020

DO - 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.03.020

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 931

EP - 936

JO - Crop Protection

JF - Crop Protection

SN - 0261-2194

IS - 7

ER -