Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and jo...

Electronic data

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: examining main and moderating effects

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: examining main and moderating effects. / Gilboa, S; Shirom, A; Fried, Y; Cooper, C L.

In: Personnel Psychology, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2008, p. 227-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Gilboa, S ; Shirom, A ; Fried, Y ; Cooper, C L. / A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: examining main and moderating effects. In: Personnel Psychology. 2008 ; Vol. 61, No. 2. pp. 227-271.

Bibtex

@article{c5b89cc6d134485782a7f63892032e15,
title = "A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: examining main and moderating effects",
abstract = "We quantitatively integrated 169 samples (N= 35,265 employees) that have been used to investigate the relationships of the following 7 work-related stressors with job performance: role ambiguity, role conflict, role overload, job insecurity, work–family conflict, environmental uncertainty, and situational constraints. Overall, we obtained a negative mean correlation between each job performance measure and each stressor included in our analyses. As hypothesized, role ambiguity and situational constraints were most strongly negatively related to performance, relative to the other work-related stressors. Analysis of moderators revealed that (a) the negative correlation of role overload and performance was higher among managers relative to nonmanagers; (b) publication year moderated the relation of role ambiguity and role overload with performance, although in opposite directions; (c) the correlations obtained for published versus unpublished studies were not significantly different; and (d) using the Rizzo et al. scale of role ambiguity and role conflict decreased the magnitude of the correlations of these stressors with performance, relative to other scales. Theoretical contributions, future research directions, and practical implications are discussed.",
author = "S Gilboa and A Shirom and Y Fried and Cooper, {C L}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00113.x",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "227--271",
journal = "Personnel Psychology",
issn = "0031-5826",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: examining main and moderating effects

AU - Gilboa, S

AU - Shirom, A

AU - Fried, Y

AU - Cooper, C L

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - We quantitatively integrated 169 samples (N= 35,265 employees) that have been used to investigate the relationships of the following 7 work-related stressors with job performance: role ambiguity, role conflict, role overload, job insecurity, work–family conflict, environmental uncertainty, and situational constraints. Overall, we obtained a negative mean correlation between each job performance measure and each stressor included in our analyses. As hypothesized, role ambiguity and situational constraints were most strongly negatively related to performance, relative to the other work-related stressors. Analysis of moderators revealed that (a) the negative correlation of role overload and performance was higher among managers relative to nonmanagers; (b) publication year moderated the relation of role ambiguity and role overload with performance, although in opposite directions; (c) the correlations obtained for published versus unpublished studies were not significantly different; and (d) using the Rizzo et al. scale of role ambiguity and role conflict decreased the magnitude of the correlations of these stressors with performance, relative to other scales. Theoretical contributions, future research directions, and practical implications are discussed.

AB - We quantitatively integrated 169 samples (N= 35,265 employees) that have been used to investigate the relationships of the following 7 work-related stressors with job performance: role ambiguity, role conflict, role overload, job insecurity, work–family conflict, environmental uncertainty, and situational constraints. Overall, we obtained a negative mean correlation between each job performance measure and each stressor included in our analyses. As hypothesized, role ambiguity and situational constraints were most strongly negatively related to performance, relative to the other work-related stressors. Analysis of moderators revealed that (a) the negative correlation of role overload and performance was higher among managers relative to nonmanagers; (b) publication year moderated the relation of role ambiguity and role overload with performance, although in opposite directions; (c) the correlations obtained for published versus unpublished studies were not significantly different; and (d) using the Rizzo et al. scale of role ambiguity and role conflict decreased the magnitude of the correlations of these stressors with performance, relative to other scales. Theoretical contributions, future research directions, and practical implications are discussed.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00113.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00113.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 61

SP - 227

EP - 271

JO - Personnel Psychology

JF - Personnel Psychology

SN - 0031-5826

IS - 2

ER -