Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A multi-model assessment of pollution transport...

Electronic data

  • acp-8-5353-2008.pdf

    Rights statement: © Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

    Final published version, 1.86 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic. / Shindell, D. T.; Chin, M.; Dentener, F. et al.
In: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , Vol. 8, No. 17, 10.09.2008, p. 5353-5372.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Shindell, DT, Chin, M, Dentener, F, Doherty, RM, Faluvegi, G, Fiore, AM, Hess, P, Koch, DM, MacKenzie, IA, Sanderson, MG, Schultz, MG, Schulz, M, Stevenson, DS, Teich, H, Textor, C, Wild, O, Bergmann, DJ, Bey, I, Bian, H, Cuvelier, C, Duncan, BN, Folberth, G, Horowitz, LW, Jonson, J, Kaminski, JW, Marmer, E, Park, R, Pringle, KJ, Schroeder, S, Szopa, S, Takemura, T, Zeng, G, Keating, TJ & Zuber, A 2008, 'A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic.', Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , vol. 8, no. 17, pp. 5353-5372. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5353-2008

APA

Shindell, D. T., Chin, M., Dentener, F., Doherty, R. M., Faluvegi, G., Fiore, A. M., Hess, P., Koch, D. M., MacKenzie, I. A., Sanderson, M. G., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M., Stevenson, D. S., Teich, H., Textor, C., Wild, O., Bergmann, D. J., Bey, I., Bian, H., ... Zuber, A. (2008). A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , 8(17), 5353-5372. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5353-2008

Vancouver

Shindell DT, Chin M, Dentener F, Doherty RM, Faluvegi G, Fiore AM et al. A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics . 2008 Sept 10;8(17):5353-5372. doi: 10.5194/acp-8-5353-2008

Author

Shindell, D. T. ; Chin, M. ; Dentener, F. et al. / A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic. In: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics . 2008 ; Vol. 8, No. 17. pp. 5353-5372.

Bibtex

@article{9071a8433c244e23b0e5bade3d79dac8,
title = "A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic.",
abstract = "We examine the response of Arctic gas and aerosol concentrations to perturbations in pollutant emissions from Europe, East and South Asia, and North America using results from a coordinated model intercomparison. These sensitivities to regional emissions (mixing ratio change per unit emission) vary widely across models and species. Intermodel differences are systematic, however, so that the relative importance of different regions is robust. North America contributes the most to Arctic ozone pollution. For aerosols and CO, European emissions dominate at the Arctic surface but East Asian emissions become progressively more important with altitude, and are dominant in the upper troposphere. Sensitivities show strong seasonality: surface sensitivities typically maximize during boreal winter for European and during spring for East Asian and North American emissions. Mid-tropospheric sensitivities, however, nearly always maximize during spring or summer for all regions. Deposition of black carbon (BC) onto Greenland is most sensitive to North American emissions. North America and Europe each contribute ~40% of total BC deposition to Greenland, with ~20% from East Asia. Elsewhere in the Arctic, both sensitivity and total BC deposition are dominated by European emissions. Model diversity for aerosols is especially large, resulting primarily from differences in aerosol physical and chemical processing (including removal). Comparison of modeled aerosol concentrations with observations indicates problems in the models, and perhaps, interpretation of the measurements. For gas phase pollutants such as CO and O3, which are relatively well-simulated, the processes contributing most to uncertainties depend on the source region and altitude examined. Uncertainties in the Arctic surface CO response to emissions perturbations are dominated by emissions for East Asian sources, while uncertainties in transport, emissions, and oxidation are comparable for European and North American sources. At higher levels, model-to-model variations in transport and oxidation are most important. Differences in photochemistry appear to play the largest role in the intermodel variations in Arctic ozone sensitivity, though transport also contributes substantially in the mid-troposphere.",
keywords = "Arctic, ozone, methane, long-range transport",
author = "Shindell, {D. T.} and M. Chin and F. Dentener and Doherty, {R. M.} and G. Faluvegi and Fiore, {A. M.} and P. Hess and Koch, {D. M.} and MacKenzie, {I. A.} and Sanderson, {M. G.} and Schultz, {M. G.} and M. Schulz and Stevenson, {D. S.} and H. Teich and C. Textor and Oliver Wild and Bergmann, {D. J.} and I. Bey and H. Bian and C. Cuvelier and Duncan, {B. N.} and G. Folberth and Horowitz, {L. W.} and J. Jonson and Kaminski, {J. W.} and E. Marmer and R. Park and Pringle, {K. J.} and S. Schroeder and S. Szopa and T. Takemura and G. Zeng and Keating, {T. J.} and A. Zuber",
note = "{\textcopyright} Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.",
year = "2008",
month = sep,
day = "10",
doi = "10.5194/acp-8-5353-2008",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "5353--5372",
journal = "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics ",
issn = "1680-7316",
publisher = "Copernicus GmbH (Copernicus Publications) on behalf of the European Geosciences Union (EGU)",
number = "17",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic.

AU - Shindell, D. T.

AU - Chin, M.

AU - Dentener, F.

AU - Doherty, R. M.

AU - Faluvegi, G.

AU - Fiore, A. M.

AU - Hess, P.

AU - Koch, D. M.

AU - MacKenzie, I. A.

AU - Sanderson, M. G.

AU - Schultz, M. G.

AU - Schulz, M.

AU - Stevenson, D. S.

AU - Teich, H.

AU - Textor, C.

AU - Wild, Oliver

AU - Bergmann, D. J.

AU - Bey, I.

AU - Bian, H.

AU - Cuvelier, C.

AU - Duncan, B. N.

AU - Folberth, G.

AU - Horowitz, L. W.

AU - Jonson, J.

AU - Kaminski, J. W.

AU - Marmer, E.

AU - Park, R.

AU - Pringle, K. J.

AU - Schroeder, S.

AU - Szopa, S.

AU - Takemura, T.

AU - Zeng, G.

AU - Keating, T. J.

AU - Zuber, A.

N1 - © Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PY - 2008/9/10

Y1 - 2008/9/10

N2 - We examine the response of Arctic gas and aerosol concentrations to perturbations in pollutant emissions from Europe, East and South Asia, and North America using results from a coordinated model intercomparison. These sensitivities to regional emissions (mixing ratio change per unit emission) vary widely across models and species. Intermodel differences are systematic, however, so that the relative importance of different regions is robust. North America contributes the most to Arctic ozone pollution. For aerosols and CO, European emissions dominate at the Arctic surface but East Asian emissions become progressively more important with altitude, and are dominant in the upper troposphere. Sensitivities show strong seasonality: surface sensitivities typically maximize during boreal winter for European and during spring for East Asian and North American emissions. Mid-tropospheric sensitivities, however, nearly always maximize during spring or summer for all regions. Deposition of black carbon (BC) onto Greenland is most sensitive to North American emissions. North America and Europe each contribute ~40% of total BC deposition to Greenland, with ~20% from East Asia. Elsewhere in the Arctic, both sensitivity and total BC deposition are dominated by European emissions. Model diversity for aerosols is especially large, resulting primarily from differences in aerosol physical and chemical processing (including removal). Comparison of modeled aerosol concentrations with observations indicates problems in the models, and perhaps, interpretation of the measurements. For gas phase pollutants such as CO and O3, which are relatively well-simulated, the processes contributing most to uncertainties depend on the source region and altitude examined. Uncertainties in the Arctic surface CO response to emissions perturbations are dominated by emissions for East Asian sources, while uncertainties in transport, emissions, and oxidation are comparable for European and North American sources. At higher levels, model-to-model variations in transport and oxidation are most important. Differences in photochemistry appear to play the largest role in the intermodel variations in Arctic ozone sensitivity, though transport also contributes substantially in the mid-troposphere.

AB - We examine the response of Arctic gas and aerosol concentrations to perturbations in pollutant emissions from Europe, East and South Asia, and North America using results from a coordinated model intercomparison. These sensitivities to regional emissions (mixing ratio change per unit emission) vary widely across models and species. Intermodel differences are systematic, however, so that the relative importance of different regions is robust. North America contributes the most to Arctic ozone pollution. For aerosols and CO, European emissions dominate at the Arctic surface but East Asian emissions become progressively more important with altitude, and are dominant in the upper troposphere. Sensitivities show strong seasonality: surface sensitivities typically maximize during boreal winter for European and during spring for East Asian and North American emissions. Mid-tropospheric sensitivities, however, nearly always maximize during spring or summer for all regions. Deposition of black carbon (BC) onto Greenland is most sensitive to North American emissions. North America and Europe each contribute ~40% of total BC deposition to Greenland, with ~20% from East Asia. Elsewhere in the Arctic, both sensitivity and total BC deposition are dominated by European emissions. Model diversity for aerosols is especially large, resulting primarily from differences in aerosol physical and chemical processing (including removal). Comparison of modeled aerosol concentrations with observations indicates problems in the models, and perhaps, interpretation of the measurements. For gas phase pollutants such as CO and O3, which are relatively well-simulated, the processes contributing most to uncertainties depend on the source region and altitude examined. Uncertainties in the Arctic surface CO response to emissions perturbations are dominated by emissions for East Asian sources, while uncertainties in transport, emissions, and oxidation are comparable for European and North American sources. At higher levels, model-to-model variations in transport and oxidation are most important. Differences in photochemistry appear to play the largest role in the intermodel variations in Arctic ozone sensitivity, though transport also contributes substantially in the mid-troposphere.

KW - Arctic

KW - ozone

KW - methane

KW - long-range transport

U2 - 10.5194/acp-8-5353-2008

DO - 10.5194/acp-8-5353-2008

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 5353

EP - 5372

JO - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

JF - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

SN - 1680-7316

IS - 17

ER -