12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A quantitative investigation into women's exper...
View graph of relations

« Back

A quantitative investigation into women's experiences after a miscarriage : implications for the primary healthcare team.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date09/2003
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Journal number494
Volume53
Number of pages6
Pages697-702
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Approximately 16% of clinically confirmed pregnancies end in miscarriage. However, there is frequently no routine follow-up by the primary healthcare team (PHCT) to identify psychiatric morbidity after miscarriage. AIM: To explore women's experiences of miscarriage care that may impact on the ability of the PHCT to detect psychiatric morbidity after a miscarriage. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative study using questionnaires, semi-structured interviews of patients, and interviews of healthcare professionals in focus groups. SETTING: Patients who had experienced a miscarriage were recruited from the gynaecology wards of a district general hospital. The healthcare professionals were recruited from 14 local general practices. METHOD: Post-miscarriage 'psychiatric cases' were identified using the hospital anxiety and depression (HAD) scale. A theoretical sampling technique was used to identify patients for semi-structured interviews. Interviews with healthcare professionals were conducted in three focus groups. RESULTS: Seven themes emerged from the interviews and focus groups that characterised the experience of patients and the perception of health professionals after a miscarriage. These were a need and desire for formal follow-up plans, poor recall and understanding of initial events, a need for more information and answers, normalisation of miscarriage by the PHCT, guilt and false assumptions, variable standards of care and skills deficiencies, and suggestions for further improvements. CONCLUSION: Themes that emerged from interviews, questionnaires, and focus groups indicate that there are deficiencies and inconsistencies in current care provision that are likely to impact on the ability of the PHCT to identify psychiatric morbidity following a miscarriage.