Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A restatement of the natural science evidence c...

Electronic data

  • Floods_Restatement_Final

    Accepted author manuscript, 434 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 1/01/50

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based “natural” flood management in the United Kingdom

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based “natural” flood management in the United Kingdom. / Dadson, Simon J.; Hall, Jim; Murgatroyd, Anna; Acreman, Mike; Bates, Paul D.; Beven, Keith John; Heathwaite, Ann Louise; Holden, Joseph; Holman, Ian P.; Lane, Stuart N. ; O'Connell, Enda; Penning-Rowsell, Edmund; Reynard, Nick; Sear, David A.; Thorne, Colin; Wilby, Rob L.

In: Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 473, No. 2199, 20160706, 03.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

Dadson, SJ, Hall, J, Murgatroyd, A, Acreman, M, Bates, PD, Beven, KJ, Heathwaite, AL, Holden, J, Holman, IP, Lane, SN, O'Connell, E, Penning-Rowsell, E, Reynard, N, Sear, DA, Thorne, C & Wilby, RL 2017, 'A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based “natural” flood management in the United Kingdom' Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 473, no. 2199, 20160706. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0706

APA

Dadson, S. J., Hall, J., Murgatroyd, A., Acreman, M., Bates, P. D., Beven, K. J., ... Wilby, R. L. (2017). A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based “natural” flood management in the United Kingdom. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 473(2199), [20160706]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0706

Vancouver

Dadson SJ, Hall J, Murgatroyd A, Acreman M, Bates PD, Beven KJ et al. A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based “natural” flood management in the United Kingdom. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2017 Mar;473(2199). 20160706. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0706

Author

Dadson, Simon J. ; Hall, Jim ; Murgatroyd, Anna ; Acreman, Mike ; Bates, Paul D. ; Beven, Keith John ; Heathwaite, Ann Louise ; Holden, Joseph ; Holman, Ian P. ; Lane, Stuart N. ; O'Connell, Enda ; Penning-Rowsell, Edmund ; Reynard, Nick ; Sear, David A. ; Thorne, Colin ; Wilby, Rob L. / A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based “natural” flood management in the United Kingdom. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2017 ; Vol. 473, No. 2199.

Bibtex

@article{49f71ebff814451dac8c05b64b2b8146,
title = "A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based “natural” flood management in the United Kingdom",
abstract = "Flooding is a very costly natural hazard in the UK and is expected to increase further under future climate change scenarios. Flood defences are commonly deployed to protect communities and property from flooding, but in recent years flood management policy has looked towards solutions that seek to mitigate flood risk at flood-prone sites through targeted interventions throughout the catchment, sometimes using techniques which involve working with natural processes. This paper describes a project to provide a succinct summary of the natural science evidence base concerning the effectiveness of catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK. The evidence summary is designed to be read by an informed but not technically specialist audience. Each evidence statement is placed into one of four categories describing the nature of the underlying information. The evidence summary forms the appendix to this paper and an annotated bibliography is provided in the electronic supplementary material.",
keywords = "flood risk management, hydrology, natural flood management, science policy",
author = "Dadson, {Simon J.} and Jim Hall and Anna Murgatroyd and Mike Acreman and Bates, {Paul D.} and Beven, {Keith John} and Heathwaite, {Ann Louise} and Joseph Holden and Holman, {Ian P.} and Lane, {Stuart N.} and Enda O'Connell and Edmund Penning-Rowsell and Nick Reynard and Sear, {David A.} and Colin Thorne and Wilby, {Rob L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1098/rspa.2016.0706",
language = "English",
volume = "473",
journal = "Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences",
issn = "1364-5021",
publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry Publishing",
number = "2199",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based “natural” flood management in the United Kingdom

AU - Dadson, Simon J.

AU - Hall, Jim

AU - Murgatroyd, Anna

AU - Acreman, Mike

AU - Bates, Paul D.

AU - Beven, Keith John

AU - Heathwaite, Ann Louise

AU - Holden, Joseph

AU - Holman, Ian P.

AU - Lane, Stuart N.

AU - O'Connell, Enda

AU - Penning-Rowsell, Edmund

AU - Reynard, Nick

AU - Sear, David A.

AU - Thorne, Colin

AU - Wilby, Rob L.

PY - 2017/3

Y1 - 2017/3

N2 - Flooding is a very costly natural hazard in the UK and is expected to increase further under future climate change scenarios. Flood defences are commonly deployed to protect communities and property from flooding, but in recent years flood management policy has looked towards solutions that seek to mitigate flood risk at flood-prone sites through targeted interventions throughout the catchment, sometimes using techniques which involve working with natural processes. This paper describes a project to provide a succinct summary of the natural science evidence base concerning the effectiveness of catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK. The evidence summary is designed to be read by an informed but not technically specialist audience. Each evidence statement is placed into one of four categories describing the nature of the underlying information. The evidence summary forms the appendix to this paper and an annotated bibliography is provided in the electronic supplementary material.

AB - Flooding is a very costly natural hazard in the UK and is expected to increase further under future climate change scenarios. Flood defences are commonly deployed to protect communities and property from flooding, but in recent years flood management policy has looked towards solutions that seek to mitigate flood risk at flood-prone sites through targeted interventions throughout the catchment, sometimes using techniques which involve working with natural processes. This paper describes a project to provide a succinct summary of the natural science evidence base concerning the effectiveness of catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK. The evidence summary is designed to be read by an informed but not technically specialist audience. Each evidence statement is placed into one of four categories describing the nature of the underlying information. The evidence summary forms the appendix to this paper and an annotated bibliography is provided in the electronic supplementary material.

KW - flood risk management

KW - hydrology

KW - natural flood management

KW - science policy

U2 - 10.1098/rspa.2016.0706

DO - 10.1098/rspa.2016.0706

M3 - Journal article

VL - 473

JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

SN - 1364-5021

IS - 2199

M1 - 20160706

ER -