Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based “natural” flood management in the United Kingdom
AU - Dadson, Simon J.
AU - Hall, Jim
AU - Murgatroyd, Anna
AU - Acreman, Mike
AU - Bates, Paul D.
AU - Beven, Keith John
AU - Heathwaite, Ann Louise
AU - Holden, Joseph
AU - Holman, Ian P.
AU - Lane, Stuart N.
AU - O'Connell, Enda
AU - Penning-Rowsell, Edmund
AU - Reynard, Nick
AU - Sear, David A.
AU - Thorne, Colin
AU - Wilby, Rob L.
PY - 2017/3
Y1 - 2017/3
N2 - Flooding is a very costly natural hazard in the UK and is expected to increase further under future climate change scenarios. Flood defences are commonly deployed to protect communities and property from flooding, but in recent years flood management policy has looked towards solutions that seek to mitigate flood risk at flood-prone sites through targeted interventions throughout the catchment, sometimes using techniques which involve working with natural processes. This paper describes a project to provide a succinct summary of the natural science evidence base concerning the effectiveness of catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK. The evidence summary is designed to be read by an informed but not technically specialist audience. Each evidence statement is placed into one of four categories describing the nature of the underlying information. The evidence summary forms the appendix to this paper and an annotated bibliography is provided in the electronic supplementary material.
AB - Flooding is a very costly natural hazard in the UK and is expected to increase further under future climate change scenarios. Flood defences are commonly deployed to protect communities and property from flooding, but in recent years flood management policy has looked towards solutions that seek to mitigate flood risk at flood-prone sites through targeted interventions throughout the catchment, sometimes using techniques which involve working with natural processes. This paper describes a project to provide a succinct summary of the natural science evidence base concerning the effectiveness of catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK. The evidence summary is designed to be read by an informed but not technically specialist audience. Each evidence statement is placed into one of four categories describing the nature of the underlying information. The evidence summary forms the appendix to this paper and an annotated bibliography is provided in the electronic supplementary material.
KW - flood risk management
KW - hydrology
KW - natural flood management
KW - science policy
U2 - 10.1098/rspa.2016.0706
DO - 10.1098/rspa.2016.0706
M3 - Journal article
VL - 473
JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
SN - 1364-5021
IS - 2199
M1 - 20160706
ER -