Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A review of the demographic, clinical and psych...
View graph of relations

A review of the demographic, clinical and psychosocial correlates of perceived control in three chronic motor illnesses

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

A review of the demographic, clinical and psychosocial correlates of perceived control in three chronic motor illnesses. / Eccles, Fiona; Simpson, Jane.
In: Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 33, No. 13-14, 2011, p. 1065-88.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Eccles F, Simpson J. A review of the demographic, clinical and psychosocial correlates of perceived control in three chronic motor illnesses. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2011;33(13-14):1065-88. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.525287

Author

Bibtex

@article{7420aeb19cdd4abea9e14625c5a65081,
title = "A review of the demographic, clinical and psychosocial correlates of perceived control in three chronic motor illnesses",
abstract = "Purpose. To review the correlates of measures of control in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease (PD) and motor neurone disease (MND).Method. Studies on the relationship between aspects of control and demographic, clinical and psychological factors were collated and reviewed using a narrative synthesis.Results. Forty-four papers were found which examined different types of both disease and life control. PD studies had not examined self-efficacy or helplessness and only locus of control was used in MND studies. Age, gender and disease duration were not consistently related to control, but greater participant-rated physical impairment was associated with lower perception of some control concepts. The association between symptom control and psychological wellbeing was weak and may be disease dependent. Stronger positive relationships were found between psychosocial wellbeing and both global life control and self-efficacy for disease management and adjustment.Conclusions. Further research, particularly longitudinal, is needed. Perceptions of control were not completely determined by disease stage/disability. Increased perception of certain types of control was associated with wellbeing and thus interventions should be developed to promote increased control. Although results were dominated by MS, they appear largely applicable to people with PD but more caution is needed for MND.",
keywords = "Control, motor neurone disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, self-efficacy Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/09638288.2010.525287",
author = "Fiona Eccles and Jane Simpson",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.3109/09638288.2010.525287",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1065--88",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "13-14",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of the demographic, clinical and psychosocial correlates of perceived control in three chronic motor illnesses

AU - Eccles, Fiona

AU - Simpson, Jane

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose. To review the correlates of measures of control in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease (PD) and motor neurone disease (MND).Method. Studies on the relationship between aspects of control and demographic, clinical and psychological factors were collated and reviewed using a narrative synthesis.Results. Forty-four papers were found which examined different types of both disease and life control. PD studies had not examined self-efficacy or helplessness and only locus of control was used in MND studies. Age, gender and disease duration were not consistently related to control, but greater participant-rated physical impairment was associated with lower perception of some control concepts. The association between symptom control and psychological wellbeing was weak and may be disease dependent. Stronger positive relationships were found between psychosocial wellbeing and both global life control and self-efficacy for disease management and adjustment.Conclusions. Further research, particularly longitudinal, is needed. Perceptions of control were not completely determined by disease stage/disability. Increased perception of certain types of control was associated with wellbeing and thus interventions should be developed to promote increased control. Although results were dominated by MS, they appear largely applicable to people with PD but more caution is needed for MND.

AB - Purpose. To review the correlates of measures of control in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease (PD) and motor neurone disease (MND).Method. Studies on the relationship between aspects of control and demographic, clinical and psychological factors were collated and reviewed using a narrative synthesis.Results. Forty-four papers were found which examined different types of both disease and life control. PD studies had not examined self-efficacy or helplessness and only locus of control was used in MND studies. Age, gender and disease duration were not consistently related to control, but greater participant-rated physical impairment was associated with lower perception of some control concepts. The association between symptom control and psychological wellbeing was weak and may be disease dependent. Stronger positive relationships were found between psychosocial wellbeing and both global life control and self-efficacy for disease management and adjustment.Conclusions. Further research, particularly longitudinal, is needed. Perceptions of control were not completely determined by disease stage/disability. Increased perception of certain types of control was associated with wellbeing and thus interventions should be developed to promote increased control. Although results were dominated by MS, they appear largely applicable to people with PD but more caution is needed for MND.

KW - Control, motor neurone disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, self-efficacy Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/09638288.2010.525287

U2 - 10.3109/09638288.2010.525287

DO - 10.3109/09638288.2010.525287

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 1065

EP - 1088

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation

SN - 0963-8288

IS - 13-14

ER -