Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A study of using cosmic-ray muon radiography to...

Electronic data

  • Env-Earth-Sci 18Apr16 RE

    Rights statement: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S12665-016-5711-5

    Accepted author manuscript, 3.28 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A study of using cosmic-ray muon radiography to detect CO2 leakage from a primary storage into geological formations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Article number912
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>05/2016
<mark>Journal</mark>Environmental Earth Sciences
Volume75
Number of pages13
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date19/05/16
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

In CO2 geological sequestration, a combination of monitoring techniques needs to be in place to timely detect possible CO2 leakage from a primary storage along unanticipated pathways to shallower formations. This research aims to methodologically investigate the feasibility of a novel radiographic technique, i.e. cosmic-ray muon radiography, as a complementary continuous monitoring method. As an example, this method was tested on a geological model to monitor CO2 leakage into upper freshwater aquifers. The effectiveness of the method was preliminarily established by high-fidelity simulations, including the sensitivity for responding to CO2 leakage and the spatial resolution that can be achieved by the method. The simulation results indicate an increase of penetrating flux of the cosmic-ray muons with the increase of CO2 leakage in the monitored aquifers. The sensitivity tends to be higher in monitoring leakage taking place in shallower depths. At depths of about 200 m, the detectable CO2 can be as low as 3 % measured in volume fraction with a relatively high confidence level. The spatial resolution can be achieved within a range from 10 to 20 m for measurements at depths of no more than 520 m, demonstrating the effectiveness of the method.

Bibliographic note

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S12665-016-5711-5