Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Access to the countryside

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • Tragedy_of_the_House_of_Commons

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Mayfield, B. (2017) Access to the countryside: the tragedy of the house of commons. Legal Studies, 37: 343–362. doi: 10.1111/lest.12154. which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lest.12154/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

    Accepted author manuscript, 240 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Access to the countryside: the tragedy of the House of Commons

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Access to the countryside : the tragedy of the House of Commons. / Mayfield, Benjamin John William.

In: Legal Studies, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.06.2017, p. 343-362.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{3b117f2bc98344dbb0b3a8f1766f73ed,
title = "Access to the countryside: the tragedy of the House of Commons",
abstract = "The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 (the CRoW Act) serves as an example of the way in which ideology can frequently become a casualty of realpolitik. Wider access to the countryside was a pillar of Labour Party general election manifestos from the 1950s until the introduction of the CRoW Act. This article examines the antecedents and emergence of this statute to determine whether the eventual form of the rights of access under the CRoW Act represent a missed opportunity to grant public rights over private land.",
author = "Mayfield, {Benjamin John William}",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Mayfield, B. (2017) Access to the countryside: the tragedy of the house of commons. Legal Studies, 37: 343–362. doi: 10.1111/lest.12154. which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lest.12154/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.",
year = "2017",
month = jun
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/lest.12154",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "343--362",
journal = "Legal Studies",
issn = "0261-3875",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Access to the countryside

T2 - the tragedy of the House of Commons

AU - Mayfield, Benjamin John William

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Mayfield, B. (2017) Access to the countryside: the tragedy of the house of commons. Legal Studies, 37: 343–362. doi: 10.1111/lest.12154. which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lest.12154/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 (the CRoW Act) serves as an example of the way in which ideology can frequently become a casualty of realpolitik. Wider access to the countryside was a pillar of Labour Party general election manifestos from the 1950s until the introduction of the CRoW Act. This article examines the antecedents and emergence of this statute to determine whether the eventual form of the rights of access under the CRoW Act represent a missed opportunity to grant public rights over private land.

AB - The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 (the CRoW Act) serves as an example of the way in which ideology can frequently become a casualty of realpolitik. Wider access to the countryside was a pillar of Labour Party general election manifestos from the 1950s until the introduction of the CRoW Act. This article examines the antecedents and emergence of this statute to determine whether the eventual form of the rights of access under the CRoW Act represent a missed opportunity to grant public rights over private land.

U2 - 10.1111/lest.12154

DO - 10.1111/lest.12154

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 343

EP - 362

JO - Legal Studies

JF - Legal Studies

SN - 0261-3875

IS - 2

ER -