Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in...
View graph of relations

Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research : issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework. / Beattie, Vivien.

In: British Accounting Review, Vol. 46, No. 2, 06.2014, p. 111-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{9a11529f2b9f4a24b7cb406b67a18cb9,
title = "Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework",
abstract = "This plenary address paper traces the development of accounting narratives in external reporting practice and research, focussing on corporate-sourced financial communications to shareholders and analysts. It is written from the personal perspective of a researcher who began in the positivist tradition of disclosure research and is increasingly engaging with the more interpretive/critical tradition of socially-constructed narratives. Whereas early accounting narratives research existed at the margins, modern content-analytic work on disclosures rose to a position of prominence, alongside the rise of non-financial information in the practice domain. In recent years, large-scale linguistic studies have entered the mainstream positivist North American literature, supported by computerised natural language processing. Outside this community, accounting research has witnessed a {\textquoteleft}narrative turn{\textquoteright}, similar to many other social science disciplines, marking a shift away from realism and positivism. This paper argues for the importance of both lines of research. Participants{\textquoteright} actions in relation to accounting narratives may be understood in terms of, inter alia, both economic explanations based on utility maximisation and behavioural explanations based on psychology and the embeddedness of narrative in social practice. In terms of methodology and methods, the weakening of the deep-surface divide is exemplified by the common combination of corpus linguistics approaches with (critical) discourse analysis in other disciplines. Based on a discussion of key issues, theory, methodology and methods, a framework for thinking about research in accounting narratives is offered. The challenge is to better understand the role of narratives in the increasingly rich, complex information environment of external reporting.",
keywords = "accounting narratives, content analysis , corpus linguistics , discourse analysis , storytelling , sensemaking",
author = "Vivien Beattie",
year = "2014",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1016/j.bar.2014.05.001",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "111--134",
journal = "British Accounting Review",
issn = "0890-8389",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research

T2 - issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework

AU - Beattie, Vivien

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - This plenary address paper traces the development of accounting narratives in external reporting practice and research, focussing on corporate-sourced financial communications to shareholders and analysts. It is written from the personal perspective of a researcher who began in the positivist tradition of disclosure research and is increasingly engaging with the more interpretive/critical tradition of socially-constructed narratives. Whereas early accounting narratives research existed at the margins, modern content-analytic work on disclosures rose to a position of prominence, alongside the rise of non-financial information in the practice domain. In recent years, large-scale linguistic studies have entered the mainstream positivist North American literature, supported by computerised natural language processing. Outside this community, accounting research has witnessed a ‘narrative turn’, similar to many other social science disciplines, marking a shift away from realism and positivism. This paper argues for the importance of both lines of research. Participants’ actions in relation to accounting narratives may be understood in terms of, inter alia, both economic explanations based on utility maximisation and behavioural explanations based on psychology and the embeddedness of narrative in social practice. In terms of methodology and methods, the weakening of the deep-surface divide is exemplified by the common combination of corpus linguistics approaches with (critical) discourse analysis in other disciplines. Based on a discussion of key issues, theory, methodology and methods, a framework for thinking about research in accounting narratives is offered. The challenge is to better understand the role of narratives in the increasingly rich, complex information environment of external reporting.

AB - This plenary address paper traces the development of accounting narratives in external reporting practice and research, focussing on corporate-sourced financial communications to shareholders and analysts. It is written from the personal perspective of a researcher who began in the positivist tradition of disclosure research and is increasingly engaging with the more interpretive/critical tradition of socially-constructed narratives. Whereas early accounting narratives research existed at the margins, modern content-analytic work on disclosures rose to a position of prominence, alongside the rise of non-financial information in the practice domain. In recent years, large-scale linguistic studies have entered the mainstream positivist North American literature, supported by computerised natural language processing. Outside this community, accounting research has witnessed a ‘narrative turn’, similar to many other social science disciplines, marking a shift away from realism and positivism. This paper argues for the importance of both lines of research. Participants’ actions in relation to accounting narratives may be understood in terms of, inter alia, both economic explanations based on utility maximisation and behavioural explanations based on psychology and the embeddedness of narrative in social practice. In terms of methodology and methods, the weakening of the deep-surface divide is exemplified by the common combination of corpus linguistics approaches with (critical) discourse analysis in other disciplines. Based on a discussion of key issues, theory, methodology and methods, a framework for thinking about research in accounting narratives is offered. The challenge is to better understand the role of narratives in the increasingly rich, complex information environment of external reporting.

KW - accounting narratives

KW - content analysis

KW - corpus linguistics

KW - discourse analysis

KW - storytelling

KW - sensemaking

U2 - 10.1016/j.bar.2014.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.bar.2014.05.001

M3 - Journal article

VL - 46

SP - 111

EP - 134

JO - British Accounting Review

JF - British Accounting Review

SN - 0890-8389

IS - 2

ER -