Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Adopting neuroscience

Electronic data

  • mackenzie_roberts_adopting_science_revised_aug2016

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Body & Society, 23 (3), 2017, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Body and Society page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/bod on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 530 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Adopting neuroscience: parenting and affective indeterminacy

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Adopting neuroscience: parenting and affective indeterminacy. / MacKenzie, Adrian Bruce; Roberts, Celia Mary.
In: Body and Society, Vol. 23, No. 3, 01.09.2017, p. 130-155.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

MacKenzie AB, Roberts CM. Adopting neuroscience: parenting and affective indeterminacy. Body and Society. 2017 Sept 1;23(3):130-155. Epub 2017 Jul 31. doi: 10.1177/1357034X17716521

Author

Bibtex

@article{0bc25aa1dd56409c8d024ed253604f5b,
title = "Adopting neuroscience: parenting and affective indeterminacy",
abstract = "What happens when neuroscientific knowledges move from laboratories and clinics into therapeutic settings concerned with the care of children? {\textquoteleft}Brain-based parenting{\textquoteright} is a set of discourses and practices emerging at the confluence of attachment theory, neuroscience, psychotherapy and social work. The neuroscientific knowledges involved understand affective states such as fear, anger and intimacy as dynamic patterns of coordination between brain localities, as well as flows of biochemical signals via hormones such as cortisol. Drawing on our own attempts to adopt brain-based parenting, and engaging with various strands and critiques of new materialism and affect theory, we explore the ways in which the social sciences and humanities might fruitfully engage with neuroscientific concepts and affects. How does science-affected indeterminacy, with all its promises of ontological and experiential agency, help us to observe, wait, bind or hold together volatile mixtures of habit, speech and action?",
author = "MacKenzie, {Adrian Bruce} and Roberts, {Celia Mary}",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Body & Society, 23 (3), 2017, {\textcopyright} SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Body and Society page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/bod on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/ ",
year = "2017",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1357034X17716521",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "130--155",
journal = "Body and Society",
issn = "1357-034X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adopting neuroscience

T2 - parenting and affective indeterminacy

AU - MacKenzie, Adrian Bruce

AU - Roberts, Celia Mary

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Body & Society, 23 (3), 2017, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Body and Society page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/bod on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - What happens when neuroscientific knowledges move from laboratories and clinics into therapeutic settings concerned with the care of children? ‘Brain-based parenting’ is a set of discourses and practices emerging at the confluence of attachment theory, neuroscience, psychotherapy and social work. The neuroscientific knowledges involved understand affective states such as fear, anger and intimacy as dynamic patterns of coordination between brain localities, as well as flows of biochemical signals via hormones such as cortisol. Drawing on our own attempts to adopt brain-based parenting, and engaging with various strands and critiques of new materialism and affect theory, we explore the ways in which the social sciences and humanities might fruitfully engage with neuroscientific concepts and affects. How does science-affected indeterminacy, with all its promises of ontological and experiential agency, help us to observe, wait, bind or hold together volatile mixtures of habit, speech and action?

AB - What happens when neuroscientific knowledges move from laboratories and clinics into therapeutic settings concerned with the care of children? ‘Brain-based parenting’ is a set of discourses and practices emerging at the confluence of attachment theory, neuroscience, psychotherapy and social work. The neuroscientific knowledges involved understand affective states such as fear, anger and intimacy as dynamic patterns of coordination between brain localities, as well as flows of biochemical signals via hormones such as cortisol. Drawing on our own attempts to adopt brain-based parenting, and engaging with various strands and critiques of new materialism and affect theory, we explore the ways in which the social sciences and humanities might fruitfully engage with neuroscientific concepts and affects. How does science-affected indeterminacy, with all its promises of ontological and experiential agency, help us to observe, wait, bind or hold together volatile mixtures of habit, speech and action?

U2 - 10.1177/1357034X17716521

DO - 10.1177/1357034X17716521

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 130

EP - 155

JO - Body and Society

JF - Body and Society

SN - 1357-034X

IS - 3

ER -