12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Against Matricide
View graph of relations

« Back

Against Matricide: Rethinking subjectivity and the maternal body.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date1/01/2012
JournalHypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy
Journal number1
Volume27
Number of pages21
Pages118-138
Early online date9/02/11
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

In this article I critically re-examine Julia Kristeva’s view that becoming a speaking subject requires psychical matricide : violent separation from the maternal body. I propose an alternative, non-matricidal conception of subjectivity, in part by drawing out anti-matricidal strands in Kristeva’s own thought, including her view that early mother–child relations are triangular. Whereas she understands this triangle in terms of a first imaginary father, I re-interpret this triangle using Donald Winnicott’s idea of potential space and Jessica Benjamin’s idea of an intersubjective space of thirdness. I argue that this space provides a maternal third term: a relation of connection and difference between two, a relation that inherits the affective, mobile, generative qualities of the maternal body as the infant (according to Kristeva) imagines it. This connecting space allows both mothers and children to emerge as subjects in their own right. I then suggest that potential-maternal space expands into language, so that language intrinsically allows the possibility of a speaking position of connection with the mother. Entrance into language need not entail separation or matricide: the problem is not language as such but the particular way that speech and logos have been defined historically.