Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Age- and ability-related differences in young r...
View graph of relations

Age- and ability-related differences in young readers’ use of conjunctions.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Age- and ability-related differences in young readers’ use of conjunctions. / Cain, Kate; Patson, Nikole; Andrews, Leanne.
In: Journal of Child Language, Vol. 32, No. 4, 11.2005, p. 877-892.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Cain, K, Patson, N & Andrews, L 2005, 'Age- and ability-related differences in young readers’ use of conjunctions.', Journal of Child Language, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 877-892. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000905007014

APA

Vancouver

Cain K, Patson N, Andrews L. Age- and ability-related differences in young readers’ use of conjunctions. Journal of Child Language. 2005 Nov;32(4):877-892. doi: 10.1017/S0305000905007014

Author

Cain, Kate ; Patson, Nikole ; Andrews, Leanne. / Age- and ability-related differences in young readers’ use of conjunctions. In: Journal of Child Language. 2005 ; Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 877-892.

Bibtex

@article{7825ed10dd674fca9943fcdabdc1f2b9,
title = "Age- and ability-related differences in young readers{\textquoteright} use of conjunctions.",
abstract = "Two studies investigating young readers{\textquoteright} use of conjunctions are reported. In Study One, 145 eight- to ten-year-olds completed one of two narrative cloze tasks in which different types of conjunction were deleted. Performance for additive conjunctions was not affected by age in this study, but older children were more likely to select the target conjunction than were younger children for temporal, causal, and adversative terms. Performance was superior in the cloze task in which they were given a restricted choice of responses (three vs. seven). In Study Two, 35 eight- and nine-year-old good and poor comprehenders completed the three-choice cloze task. The poor comprehenders were less likely to select the target terms in general. Sentence-level comprehension skills did not account for their poor performance. The results indicate that understanding of the semantic relations expressed by conjunctions is still developing long after these terms are used correctly in children{\textquoteright}s speech. The findings are discussed in relation to the role of conjunctions in text comprehension.",
author = "Kate Cain and Nikole Patson and Leanne Andrews",
year = "2005",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1017/S0305000905007014",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "877--892",
journal = "Journal of Child Language",
issn = "0305-0009",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Age- and ability-related differences in young readers’ use of conjunctions.

AU - Cain, Kate

AU - Patson, Nikole

AU - Andrews, Leanne

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - Two studies investigating young readers’ use of conjunctions are reported. In Study One, 145 eight- to ten-year-olds completed one of two narrative cloze tasks in which different types of conjunction were deleted. Performance for additive conjunctions was not affected by age in this study, but older children were more likely to select the target conjunction than were younger children for temporal, causal, and adversative terms. Performance was superior in the cloze task in which they were given a restricted choice of responses (three vs. seven). In Study Two, 35 eight- and nine-year-old good and poor comprehenders completed the three-choice cloze task. The poor comprehenders were less likely to select the target terms in general. Sentence-level comprehension skills did not account for their poor performance. The results indicate that understanding of the semantic relations expressed by conjunctions is still developing long after these terms are used correctly in children’s speech. The findings are discussed in relation to the role of conjunctions in text comprehension.

AB - Two studies investigating young readers’ use of conjunctions are reported. In Study One, 145 eight- to ten-year-olds completed one of two narrative cloze tasks in which different types of conjunction were deleted. Performance for additive conjunctions was not affected by age in this study, but older children were more likely to select the target conjunction than were younger children for temporal, causal, and adversative terms. Performance was superior in the cloze task in which they were given a restricted choice of responses (three vs. seven). In Study Two, 35 eight- and nine-year-old good and poor comprehenders completed the three-choice cloze task. The poor comprehenders were less likely to select the target terms in general. Sentence-level comprehension skills did not account for their poor performance. The results indicate that understanding of the semantic relations expressed by conjunctions is still developing long after these terms are used correctly in children’s speech. The findings are discussed in relation to the role of conjunctions in text comprehension.

U2 - 10.1017/S0305000905007014

DO - 10.1017/S0305000905007014

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 877

EP - 892

JO - Journal of Child Language

JF - Journal of Child Language

SN - 0305-0009

IS - 4

ER -