Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Theoretical Biology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Theoretical Biology, 502, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110331
Accepted author manuscript, 4.25 MB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Aging a little
T2 - On the optimality of limited senescence in Escherichia coli
AU - Blitvic, Natasha
AU - Fernandez, Vicente
N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Theoretical Biology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Theoretical Biology, 502, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110331
PY - 2020/10/7
Y1 - 2020/10/7
N2 - Recent studies have shown that even in the absence of extrinsic stress, the morphologically symmetrically dividing model bacteria Escherichia coli do not generate offspring with equal reproductive fitness. Instead, daughter cells exhibit asymmetric division times that converge to two distinct growth states. This represents a limited senescence / rejuvenation process derived from asymmetric division that is stable for hundreds of generations. It remains unclear why the bacteria do not continue the senescence beyond this asymptote. Although there are inherent fitness benefits for heterogeneity in population growth rates, the two growth equilibria are surprisingly similar, differing by a few percent. In this work we derive an explicit model for the growth of a bacterial population with two growth equilibria, based on a generalized Fibonacci recurrence, in order to quantify the fitness benefit of a limited senescence process and examine costs associated with asymmetry that could generate the observed behavior. We find that with simple saturating effects of asymmetric partitioning of subcellular components, two distinct but similar growth states may be optimal while providing evolutionarily significant fitness advantages.
AB - Recent studies have shown that even in the absence of extrinsic stress, the morphologically symmetrically dividing model bacteria Escherichia coli do not generate offspring with equal reproductive fitness. Instead, daughter cells exhibit asymmetric division times that converge to two distinct growth states. This represents a limited senescence / rejuvenation process derived from asymmetric division that is stable for hundreds of generations. It remains unclear why the bacteria do not continue the senescence beyond this asymptote. Although there are inherent fitness benefits for heterogeneity in population growth rates, the two growth equilibria are surprisingly similar, differing by a few percent. In this work we derive an explicit model for the growth of a bacterial population with two growth equilibria, based on a generalized Fibonacci recurrence, in order to quantify the fitness benefit of a limited senescence process and examine costs associated with asymmetry that could generate the observed behavior. We find that with simple saturating effects of asymmetric partitioning of subcellular components, two distinct but similar growth states may be optimal while providing evolutionarily significant fitness advantages.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110331
DO - 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110331
M3 - Journal article
VL - 502
JO - Journal of Theoretical Biology
JF - Journal of Theoretical Biology
SN - 0022-5193
M1 - 110331
ER -