Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > American Immunity
View graph of relations

American Immunity: War Crimes and the Limits of International Law

Research output: Book/Report/ProceedingsBook

Published

Standard

American Immunity : War Crimes and the Limits of International Law. / Hagopian, Patrick.

Amherst, Mass : University of Massachusetts Press, 2013. 280 p.

Research output: Book/Report/ProceedingsBook

Harvard

Hagopian, P 2013, American Immunity: War Crimes and the Limits of International Law. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, Mass.

APA

Hagopian, P. (2013). American Immunity: War Crimes and the Limits of International Law. Amherst, Mass: University of Massachusetts Press.

Vancouver

Hagopian P. American Immunity: War Crimes and the Limits of International Law. Amherst, Mass: University of Massachusetts Press, 2013. 280 p.

Author

Hagopian, Patrick. / American Immunity : War Crimes and the Limits of International Law. Amherst, Mass : University of Massachusetts Press, 2013. 280 p.

Bibtex

@book{5d387915684742159227ea0677a46ec2,
title = "American Immunity: War Crimes and the Limits of International Law",
abstract = "This book is a study of the “jurisdictional gap” that existed for 40 years as a result of a United States Supreme Court decision in 1955. This decision determined that U.S. military veterans could not be prosecuted by court martial for crimes that they had committed beyond the nation’s borders and which were not detected until the suspects were separated from the military services. Because of the territorial limitations on the jurisdiction of U.S. civilian courts, this meant that there was no court in which veteran suspects could be tried for war crimes. Consequently, numerous American citizens literally got away with murder. This article traces the legislative history of the attempts to close the jurisdictional gap from 1955 to 2000, when the U.S. Congress vested jurisdiction over such crimes and suspects in federal district courts; it assesses the reasons for the years of failure to pass remedial legislation, as well as the pressures that ultimately led to the passage of the law that plugged the jurisdictional gap; and it analyses the verdicts and implications of the first two cases in which U.S. veterans of the war in Iraq were tried for crimes against Iraqi civilians.",
keywords = "military justice, U.S. history, war crimes",
author = "Patrick Hagopian",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781625340467",
publisher = "University of Massachusetts Press",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - American Immunity

T2 - War Crimes and the Limits of International Law

AU - Hagopian, Patrick

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This book is a study of the “jurisdictional gap” that existed for 40 years as a result of a United States Supreme Court decision in 1955. This decision determined that U.S. military veterans could not be prosecuted by court martial for crimes that they had committed beyond the nation’s borders and which were not detected until the suspects were separated from the military services. Because of the territorial limitations on the jurisdiction of U.S. civilian courts, this meant that there was no court in which veteran suspects could be tried for war crimes. Consequently, numerous American citizens literally got away with murder. This article traces the legislative history of the attempts to close the jurisdictional gap from 1955 to 2000, when the U.S. Congress vested jurisdiction over such crimes and suspects in federal district courts; it assesses the reasons for the years of failure to pass remedial legislation, as well as the pressures that ultimately led to the passage of the law that plugged the jurisdictional gap; and it analyses the verdicts and implications of the first two cases in which U.S. veterans of the war in Iraq were tried for crimes against Iraqi civilians.

AB - This book is a study of the “jurisdictional gap” that existed for 40 years as a result of a United States Supreme Court decision in 1955. This decision determined that U.S. military veterans could not be prosecuted by court martial for crimes that they had committed beyond the nation’s borders and which were not detected until the suspects were separated from the military services. Because of the territorial limitations on the jurisdiction of U.S. civilian courts, this meant that there was no court in which veteran suspects could be tried for war crimes. Consequently, numerous American citizens literally got away with murder. This article traces the legislative history of the attempts to close the jurisdictional gap from 1955 to 2000, when the U.S. Congress vested jurisdiction over such crimes and suspects in federal district courts; it assesses the reasons for the years of failure to pass remedial legislation, as well as the pressures that ultimately led to the passage of the law that plugged the jurisdictional gap; and it analyses the verdicts and implications of the first two cases in which U.S. veterans of the war in Iraq were tried for crimes against Iraqi civilians.

KW - military justice

KW - U.S. history

KW - war crimes

M3 - Book

SN - 9781625340467

BT - American Immunity

PB - University of Massachusetts Press

CY - Amherst, Mass

ER -