Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > An analysis of the likely success of policy act...

Electronic data

  • Whyatt-etal-EPM-accepted

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Environmental Science and Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Environmental Science and Policy, 73, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.007

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.16 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

An analysis of the likely success of policy actions under uncertainty: recovery from acidification across Great Britain

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

An analysis of the likely success of policy actions under uncertainty: recovery from acidification across Great Britain. / Whyatt, James Duncan; Metcalfe, Sarah; Derwent, Richard et al.
In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 73, 07.2017, p. 124-132.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Whyatt JD, Metcalfe S, Derwent R, Page TJC. An analysis of the likely success of policy actions under uncertainty: recovery from acidification across Great Britain. Environmental Science and Policy. 2017 Jul;73:124-132. Epub 2017 May 3. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.007

Author

Whyatt, James Duncan ; Metcalfe, Sarah ; Derwent, Richard et al. / An analysis of the likely success of policy actions under uncertainty : recovery from acidification across Great Britain. In: Environmental Science and Policy. 2017 ; Vol. 73. pp. 124-132.

Bibtex

@article{bbb66f5fd7584b28acf3fe055278f1ba,
title = "An analysis of the likely success of policy actions under uncertainty: recovery from acidification across Great Britain",
abstract = "In the context of wider debates about the role of uncertainty in environmental science and the development of environmental policy, we use a Generalised Likelihood Uncertainty Estimate (GLUE) approach to address the uncertainty in both acid deposition model predictions and in the sensitivity of the soils to assess the likely success of policy actions to reduce acid deposition damage across Great Britain. A subset of 11, 699 acid deposition model runs that adequately represented observed deposition data were used to provide acid deposition distributions for 2005 and 2020, following a substantial reduction in SO2 and NOx emissions. Uncertain critical loads data for soils were then combined with these deposition data to derive estimates of the accumulated exceedance (AE) of critical loads for 2005 and 2020. For the more sensitive soils, the differences in accumulated exceedance between 2005 and 2020 were such that we could be sure that they were significant and a meaningful environmental improvement would result. For the least sensitive soils, critical loads were largely met by 2020, hence uncertainties in the differences in accumulated exceedance were of little policy relevance. Our approach of combining estimates of uncertainty in both a pollutionmodel and an effects model, shows that even taking these combined uncertainties into account, policy-makers can be sure that the substantial planned reduction in acidic emissions will reduce critical loads exceedances. The use of accumulated exceedance as a relative measure of environmental protection provides additional information to policy makers in tackling this {\textquoteleft}wicked problem{\textquoteright}.",
keywords = "HARM, GLUE, Uncertainty, Critical loads, Acid Deposition",
author = "Whyatt, {James Duncan} and Sarah Metcalfe and Richard Derwent and Page, {Trevor John Charles}",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Environmental Science and Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Environmental Science and Policy, 73, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.007",
year = "2017",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.007",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "124--132",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCI LTD",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An analysis of the likely success of policy actions under uncertainty

T2 - recovery from acidification across Great Britain

AU - Whyatt, James Duncan

AU - Metcalfe, Sarah

AU - Derwent, Richard

AU - Page, Trevor John Charles

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Environmental Science and Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Environmental Science and Policy, 73, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.007

PY - 2017/7

Y1 - 2017/7

N2 - In the context of wider debates about the role of uncertainty in environmental science and the development of environmental policy, we use a Generalised Likelihood Uncertainty Estimate (GLUE) approach to address the uncertainty in both acid deposition model predictions and in the sensitivity of the soils to assess the likely success of policy actions to reduce acid deposition damage across Great Britain. A subset of 11, 699 acid deposition model runs that adequately represented observed deposition data were used to provide acid deposition distributions for 2005 and 2020, following a substantial reduction in SO2 and NOx emissions. Uncertain critical loads data for soils were then combined with these deposition data to derive estimates of the accumulated exceedance (AE) of critical loads for 2005 and 2020. For the more sensitive soils, the differences in accumulated exceedance between 2005 and 2020 were such that we could be sure that they were significant and a meaningful environmental improvement would result. For the least sensitive soils, critical loads were largely met by 2020, hence uncertainties in the differences in accumulated exceedance were of little policy relevance. Our approach of combining estimates of uncertainty in both a pollutionmodel and an effects model, shows that even taking these combined uncertainties into account, policy-makers can be sure that the substantial planned reduction in acidic emissions will reduce critical loads exceedances. The use of accumulated exceedance as a relative measure of environmental protection provides additional information to policy makers in tackling this ‘wicked problem’.

AB - In the context of wider debates about the role of uncertainty in environmental science and the development of environmental policy, we use a Generalised Likelihood Uncertainty Estimate (GLUE) approach to address the uncertainty in both acid deposition model predictions and in the sensitivity of the soils to assess the likely success of policy actions to reduce acid deposition damage across Great Britain. A subset of 11, 699 acid deposition model runs that adequately represented observed deposition data were used to provide acid deposition distributions for 2005 and 2020, following a substantial reduction in SO2 and NOx emissions. Uncertain critical loads data for soils were then combined with these deposition data to derive estimates of the accumulated exceedance (AE) of critical loads for 2005 and 2020. For the more sensitive soils, the differences in accumulated exceedance between 2005 and 2020 were such that we could be sure that they were significant and a meaningful environmental improvement would result. For the least sensitive soils, critical loads were largely met by 2020, hence uncertainties in the differences in accumulated exceedance were of little policy relevance. Our approach of combining estimates of uncertainty in both a pollutionmodel and an effects model, shows that even taking these combined uncertainties into account, policy-makers can be sure that the substantial planned reduction in acidic emissions will reduce critical loads exceedances. The use of accumulated exceedance as a relative measure of environmental protection provides additional information to policy makers in tackling this ‘wicked problem’.

KW - HARM

KW - GLUE

KW - Uncertainty

KW - Critical loads

KW - Acid Deposition

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.007

M3 - Journal article

VL - 73

SP - 124

EP - 132

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -