Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > An assessment of practitioners approaches to fo...

Electronic data

  • forecasting_changepoints

    Accepted author manuscript, 267 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

An assessment of practitioners approaches to forecasting in the presence of changepoints

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

An assessment of practitioners approaches to forecasting in the presence of changepoints. / Chapman, Jamie-Leigh; Killick, Rebecca.
In: Quality and Reliability Engineering International, Vol. 36, No. 8, 01.12.2020, p. 2676-2687.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Chapman J-L, Killick R. An assessment of practitioners approaches to forecasting in the presence of changepoints. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 2020 Dec 1;36(8):2676-2687. Epub 2020 Aug 6. doi: 10.1002/qre.2712

Author

Chapman, Jamie-Leigh ; Killick, Rebecca. / An assessment of practitioners approaches to forecasting in the presence of changepoints. In: Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 2020 ; Vol. 36, No. 8. pp. 2676-2687.

Bibtex

@article{0f8183c8ef304374bc4991df7c527da8,
title = "An assessment of practitioners approaches to forecasting in the presence of changepoints",
abstract = "A common challenge in time series is to forecast data that suffer from structural breaks or changepoints which complicate modeling. If we naively forecast using one model for the whole data, the model will be incorrect, and thus, our forecast error will be large. There are two common practices to account for these changepoints when the goal is forecasting: (1) preprocess the data to identify the changepoints, incorporating them as dummy variables in modeling the whole data, and (2) include the changepoint estimation into the model and forecast using the model fit to the last segment. This article examines these two practices, using the computationally exact Pruned Exact Linear Time (PELT) algorithm for changepoint detection, comparing and contrasting them in the context of an important Software Engineering application.",
keywords = "case studies, process monitoring and control, reliability, statistical quality control",
author = "Jamie-Leigh Chapman and Rebecca Killick",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/qre.2712",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "2676--2687",
journal = "Quality and Reliability Engineering International",
issn = "0748-8017",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An assessment of practitioners approaches to forecasting in the presence of changepoints

AU - Chapman, Jamie-Leigh

AU - Killick, Rebecca

PY - 2020/12/1

Y1 - 2020/12/1

N2 - A common challenge in time series is to forecast data that suffer from structural breaks or changepoints which complicate modeling. If we naively forecast using one model for the whole data, the model will be incorrect, and thus, our forecast error will be large. There are two common practices to account for these changepoints when the goal is forecasting: (1) preprocess the data to identify the changepoints, incorporating them as dummy variables in modeling the whole data, and (2) include the changepoint estimation into the model and forecast using the model fit to the last segment. This article examines these two practices, using the computationally exact Pruned Exact Linear Time (PELT) algorithm for changepoint detection, comparing and contrasting them in the context of an important Software Engineering application.

AB - A common challenge in time series is to forecast data that suffer from structural breaks or changepoints which complicate modeling. If we naively forecast using one model for the whole data, the model will be incorrect, and thus, our forecast error will be large. There are two common practices to account for these changepoints when the goal is forecasting: (1) preprocess the data to identify the changepoints, incorporating them as dummy variables in modeling the whole data, and (2) include the changepoint estimation into the model and forecast using the model fit to the last segment. This article examines these two practices, using the computationally exact Pruned Exact Linear Time (PELT) algorithm for changepoint detection, comparing and contrasting them in the context of an important Software Engineering application.

KW - case studies

KW - process monitoring and control

KW - reliability

KW - statistical quality control

U2 - 10.1002/qre.2712

DO - 10.1002/qre.2712

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 2676

EP - 2687

JO - Quality and Reliability Engineering International

JF - Quality and Reliability Engineering International

SN - 0748-8017

IS - 8

ER -