Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > An asymmetric relationship: The spirit of Kenne...
View graph of relations

An asymmetric relationship: The spirit of Kenneth Craik and the work of Warren McCulloch

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

An asymmetric relationship: The spirit of Kenneth Craik and the work of Warren McCulloch. / Collins, Alan.
In: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Vol. 37, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 254-268.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Collins A. An asymmetric relationship: The spirit of Kenneth Craik and the work of Warren McCulloch. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 2012 Sept;37(3):254-268. doi: 10.1179/0308018812Z.00000000020

Author

Collins, Alan. / An asymmetric relationship: The spirit of Kenneth Craik and the work of Warren McCulloch. In: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 2012 ; Vol. 37, No. 3. pp. 254-268.

Bibtex

@article{2ed898536a5241e29374dc378fb9f6d1,
title = "An asymmetric relationship: The spirit of Kenneth Craik and the work of Warren McCulloch",
abstract = "Warren McCulloch held Kenneth Craik{\textquoteright}s work in high regard. What was the source of this high regard and did this good opinion mean that Craik{\textquoteright}s work had any effect on McCulloch{\textquoteright}s own work? In this article I examine aspects of Craik and McCulloch{\textquoteright}s backgrounds that help explain McCulloch{\textquoteright}s views: the important place of philosophy in their education and some shared philosophical positions, their attraction to work in diverse disciplines, a respect for the science of physiology, an acceptance that mind was a legitimate object of enquiry, the demands and opportunities of military and wartime research, and a shared sense of creating a new approach to inquiries into human abilities. Two aspects of Craik{\textquoteright}s theory about the nature of thought were also key: his claim that modelling was central to thought and the fact that those views complemented McCulloch{\textquoteright}s own. Finally, McCulloch helped to contribute to Craik{\textquoteright}s reputation and in doing so helped to create a founding father for cybernetics to be set alongside the likes of Ashby, Wiener and McCulloch himself.",
keywords = "Craik, McCulloch, History of psychology , Cybernetics",
author = "Alan Collins",
year = "2012",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1179/0308018812Z.00000000020",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "254--268",
journal = "Interdisciplinary Science Reviews",
issn = "1743-2790",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An asymmetric relationship: The spirit of Kenneth Craik and the work of Warren McCulloch

AU - Collins, Alan

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Warren McCulloch held Kenneth Craik’s work in high regard. What was the source of this high regard and did this good opinion mean that Craik’s work had any effect on McCulloch’s own work? In this article I examine aspects of Craik and McCulloch’s backgrounds that help explain McCulloch’s views: the important place of philosophy in their education and some shared philosophical positions, their attraction to work in diverse disciplines, a respect for the science of physiology, an acceptance that mind was a legitimate object of enquiry, the demands and opportunities of military and wartime research, and a shared sense of creating a new approach to inquiries into human abilities. Two aspects of Craik’s theory about the nature of thought were also key: his claim that modelling was central to thought and the fact that those views complemented McCulloch’s own. Finally, McCulloch helped to contribute to Craik’s reputation and in doing so helped to create a founding father for cybernetics to be set alongside the likes of Ashby, Wiener and McCulloch himself.

AB - Warren McCulloch held Kenneth Craik’s work in high regard. What was the source of this high regard and did this good opinion mean that Craik’s work had any effect on McCulloch’s own work? In this article I examine aspects of Craik and McCulloch’s backgrounds that help explain McCulloch’s views: the important place of philosophy in their education and some shared philosophical positions, their attraction to work in diverse disciplines, a respect for the science of physiology, an acceptance that mind was a legitimate object of enquiry, the demands and opportunities of military and wartime research, and a shared sense of creating a new approach to inquiries into human abilities. Two aspects of Craik’s theory about the nature of thought were also key: his claim that modelling was central to thought and the fact that those views complemented McCulloch’s own. Finally, McCulloch helped to contribute to Craik’s reputation and in doing so helped to create a founding father for cybernetics to be set alongside the likes of Ashby, Wiener and McCulloch himself.

KW - Craik

KW - McCulloch

KW - History of psychology

KW - Cybernetics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869798679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1179/0308018812Z.00000000020

DO - 10.1179/0308018812Z.00000000020

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84869798679

VL - 37

SP - 254

EP - 268

JO - Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

JF - Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

SN - 1743-2790

IS - 3

ER -