Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > An Experimental Comparison of Event Driven and ...

Research

Associated organisational units

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

An Experimental Comparison of Event Driven and Multi-Threaded Sensor Node Operating Systems

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review

Published

Standard

An Experimental Comparison of Event Driven and Multi-Threaded Sensor Node Operating Systems. / Duffy, Cormac; Roedig, Utz; Herbert, John et al.
Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2007. PerCom Workshops '07. Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2007. p. 267-271.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review

Harvard

Duffy, C, Roedig, U, Herbert, J & Sreenan, CJ 2007, An Experimental Comparison of Event Driven and Multi-Threaded Sensor Node Operating Systems. in Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2007. PerCom Workshops '07. Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 267-271, Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Networks and Systems for Pervasive Computing (PERSENS2007), White Plains, USA, 1/01/00. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2007.21

APA

Duffy, C., Roedig, U., Herbert, J., & Sreenan, C. J. (2007). An Experimental Comparison of Event Driven and Multi-Threaded Sensor Node Operating Systems. In Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2007. PerCom Workshops '07. Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on (pp. 267-271). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2007.21

Vancouver

Duffy C, Roedig U, Herbert J, Sreenan CJ. An Experimental Comparison of Event Driven and Multi-Threaded Sensor Node Operating Systems. In Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2007. PerCom Workshops '07. Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on. IEEE. 2007. p. 267-271 doi: 10.1109/PERCOMW.2007.21

Author

Duffy, Cormac ; Roedig, Utz ; Herbert, John et al. / An Experimental Comparison of Event Driven and Multi-Threaded Sensor Node Operating Systems. Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2007. PerCom Workshops '07. Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2007. pp. 267-271

Bibtex

@inproceedings{97b70081040546f28cc3b5676e1bf0dd,
title = "An Experimental Comparison of Event Driven and Multi-Threaded Sensor Node Operating Systems",
abstract = "Two different operating system types are currently considered for sensor networks: event driven and multi-threaded. This paper compares the two well-known operating systems TinyOS (event driven) and MANTIS (multi-threaded) regarding their memory usage, power consumption and processing capabilities. TinyOS and MANTIS are both ported to the DSYS25 sensor platform. Both operating systems are used to execute the same sensor network application and the aforementioned parameters of interest are measured. The results presented in this paper show for which set of applications each operating system is preferable.",
author = "Cormac Duffy and Utz Roedig and John Herbert and Sreenan, {Cormac J.}",
year = "2007",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1109/PERCOMW.2007.21",
language = "English",
isbn = "0-7695-2788-4 ",
pages = "267--271",
booktitle = "Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2007. PerCom Workshops '07. Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on",
publisher = "IEEE",
note = "Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Networks and Systems for Pervasive Computing (PERSENS2007), White Plains, USA ; Conference date: 01-01-1900",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - An Experimental Comparison of Event Driven and Multi-Threaded Sensor Node Operating Systems

AU - Duffy, Cormac

AU - Roedig, Utz

AU - Herbert, John

AU - Sreenan, Cormac J.

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - Two different operating system types are currently considered for sensor networks: event driven and multi-threaded. This paper compares the two well-known operating systems TinyOS (event driven) and MANTIS (multi-threaded) regarding their memory usage, power consumption and processing capabilities. TinyOS and MANTIS are both ported to the DSYS25 sensor platform. Both operating systems are used to execute the same sensor network application and the aforementioned parameters of interest are measured. The results presented in this paper show for which set of applications each operating system is preferable.

AB - Two different operating system types are currently considered for sensor networks: event driven and multi-threaded. This paper compares the two well-known operating systems TinyOS (event driven) and MANTIS (multi-threaded) regarding their memory usage, power consumption and processing capabilities. TinyOS and MANTIS are both ported to the DSYS25 sensor platform. Both operating systems are used to execute the same sensor network application and the aforementioned parameters of interest are measured. The results presented in this paper show for which set of applications each operating system is preferable.

U2 - 10.1109/PERCOMW.2007.21

DO - 10.1109/PERCOMW.2007.21

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

SN - 0-7695-2788-4

SP - 267

EP - 271

BT - Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2007. PerCom Workshops '07. Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on

PB - IEEE

T2 - Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Networks and Systems for Pervasive Computing (PERSENS2007), White Plains, USA

Y2 - 1 January 1900

ER -