Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Analogue versus propositional representation in...

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

Analogue versus propositional representation in congenitally blind individuals.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Analogue versus propositional representation in congenitally blind individuals. / Ball, L. J.; Collins, A F ; Fleming, P. et al.
In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 13, No. 6, 01.12.2006, p. 1049-1055.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Ball LJ, Collins AF, Fleming P, Ormerod TC. Analogue versus propositional representation in congenitally blind individuals. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2006 Dec 1;13(6):1049-1055.

Author

Ball, L. J. ; Collins, A F ; Fleming, P. et al. / Analogue versus propositional representation in congenitally blind individuals. In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2006 ; Vol. 13, No. 6. pp. 1049-1055.

Bibtex

@article{6e17a97fc22a4b2e87adf0145be2ce94,
title = "Analogue versus propositional representation in congenitally blind individuals.",
abstract = "Congenitally blind individuals are generally less accurate at mentally manipulating objects than sighted people. However, they often score higher on tests of short- and long-term verbal memory, and it has been suggested that an enhanced propositional representation compensates for inefficiencies in analogue visuospatial representation. Here, congenitally blind, blindfolded, and sighted participants recalled descriptions of relative object locations. In contrast to previous findings, the congenitally blind participants were as accurate as the blindfolded and sighted individuals at remembering the relative locations of objects, but their memory for the verbatim structure of presented descriptions was worse. We propose that, like sighted people, the congenitally blind spontaneously construct and remember analogue representations of object locations and that the performance discrepancies of the blind arise from the process of managing and manipulating these analogue representations.",
author = "Ball, {L. J.} and Collins, {A F} and P. Fleming and Ormerod, {T. C.}",
note = "Ball was lead author, co-designed experiments, co-wrote manuscript. Ball was first co-author's PhD supervisor. RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Psychology",
year = "2006",
month = dec,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1049--1055",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1531-5320",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analogue versus propositional representation in congenitally blind individuals.

AU - Ball, L. J.

AU - Collins, A F

AU - Fleming, P.

AU - Ormerod, T. C.

N1 - Ball was lead author, co-designed experiments, co-wrote manuscript. Ball was first co-author's PhD supervisor. RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Psychology

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Congenitally blind individuals are generally less accurate at mentally manipulating objects than sighted people. However, they often score higher on tests of short- and long-term verbal memory, and it has been suggested that an enhanced propositional representation compensates for inefficiencies in analogue visuospatial representation. Here, congenitally blind, blindfolded, and sighted participants recalled descriptions of relative object locations. In contrast to previous findings, the congenitally blind participants were as accurate as the blindfolded and sighted individuals at remembering the relative locations of objects, but their memory for the verbatim structure of presented descriptions was worse. We propose that, like sighted people, the congenitally blind spontaneously construct and remember analogue representations of object locations and that the performance discrepancies of the blind arise from the process of managing and manipulating these analogue representations.

AB - Congenitally blind individuals are generally less accurate at mentally manipulating objects than sighted people. However, they often score higher on tests of short- and long-term verbal memory, and it has been suggested that an enhanced propositional representation compensates for inefficiencies in analogue visuospatial representation. Here, congenitally blind, blindfolded, and sighted participants recalled descriptions of relative object locations. In contrast to previous findings, the congenitally blind participants were as accurate as the blindfolded and sighted individuals at remembering the relative locations of objects, but their memory for the verbatim structure of presented descriptions was worse. We propose that, like sighted people, the congenitally blind spontaneously construct and remember analogue representations of object locations and that the performance discrepancies of the blind arise from the process of managing and manipulating these analogue representations.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

SP - 1049

EP - 1055

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1531-5320

IS - 6

ER -