Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Analogy as relational priming

Research

Electronic data

  • Download

    Rights statement: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31 (4), pp 381-382 2008, © 2008 Cambridge University Press.

    Final published version, 975 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Analogy as relational priming: the challenge of self-reflection

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Analogy as relational priming: the challenge of self-reflection. / Cheshire, Andrea; Ball, Linden J.; Lewis, Charlie N.
In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 31, No. 4, 08.2008, p. 381-382.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Cheshire, A, Ball, LJ & Lewis, CN 2008, 'Analogy as relational priming: the challenge of self-reflection', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 381-382. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08004500

APA

Cheshire, A., Ball, L. J., & Lewis, C. N. (2008). Analogy as relational priming: the challenge of self-reflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(4), 381-382. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08004500

Vancouver

Cheshire A, Ball LJ, Lewis CN. Analogy as relational priming: the challenge of self-reflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2008 Aug;31(4):381-382. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X08004500

Author

Cheshire, Andrea ; Ball, Linden J. ; Lewis, Charlie N. / Analogy as relational priming : the challenge of self-reflection. In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2008 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 381-382.

Bibtex

@article{6733b5c0cd03465f9f13be51307a26e7,
title = "Analogy as relational priming: the challenge of self-reflection",
abstract = "Despite its strengths, Leech et al.'s model fails to address the important benefits that derive from self-explanation and task feedback in analogical reasoning development. These components encourage explicit, self-reflective processes that do not necessarily link to knowledge accretion. We wonder, therefore, what mechanisms can be included within a connectionist framework to model self-reflective involvement and its beneficial consequences.",
author = "Andrea Cheshire and Ball, {Linden J.} and Lewis, {Charlie N.}",
year = "2008",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X08004500",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "381--382",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analogy as relational priming

T2 - the challenge of self-reflection

AU - Cheshire, Andrea

AU - Ball, Linden J.

AU - Lewis, Charlie N.

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - Despite its strengths, Leech et al.'s model fails to address the important benefits that derive from self-explanation and task feedback in analogical reasoning development. These components encourage explicit, self-reflective processes that do not necessarily link to knowledge accretion. We wonder, therefore, what mechanisms can be included within a connectionist framework to model self-reflective involvement and its beneficial consequences.

AB - Despite its strengths, Leech et al.'s model fails to address the important benefits that derive from self-explanation and task feedback in analogical reasoning development. These components encourage explicit, self-reflective processes that do not necessarily link to knowledge accretion. We wonder, therefore, what mechanisms can be included within a connectionist framework to model self-reflective involvement and its beneficial consequences.

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X08004500

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X08004500

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 381

EP - 382

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

IS - 4

ER -