Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Analysing voice in language policy

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Analysing voice in language policy: plurality and conflict in Slovene government documents

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Analysing voice in language policy: plurality and conflict in Slovene government documents . / Savski, Kristof.
In: Language Policy, Vol. 15, No. 4, 11.2016, p. 505-524.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Savski K. Analysing voice in language policy: plurality and conflict in Slovene government documents . Language Policy. 2016 Nov;15(4):505-524. Epub 2015 Oct 1. doi: 10.1007/s10993-015-9388-5

Author

Bibtex

@article{98ca55350d594b6d9900697377483a2f,
title = "Analysing voice in language policy: plurality and conflict in Slovene government documents ",
abstract = "Contemporary analyses of language policy often tend to presume ideological uniformity, rather than focus on the contrasts between various positions, and the power struggles that those differences bring about. In this paper, I present an approach that implements the notion of voice in language policy analysis to denote the ideological positions and interests of different social actors, in this case as reflected in government documents. I propose a method of analysis based on the discourse-historical approach in critical discourse analysis and demonstrate how this exposes different social actors behind policy documents by focussing on the traces of their participation in policymaking. I analyse two different texts produced by the Slovene government and intended to specify its language policy strategy for the 2007–2011 and 2012–2016 periods. I show that there are two hegemonic voices of linguists behind both texts, one based on values of national unity, and a second based on human rights and broad inclusion. Alongside these, there are various voices from other domains of Slovene society and EU policy, all recontextualised through the prisms of the two dominant voices.",
keywords = "Language policy, Critical discourse analysis, Polyphony, Discourse historical approach, Policy documents",
author = "Kristof Savski",
year = "2016",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1007/s10993-015-9388-5",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "505--524",
journal = "Language Policy",
issn = "1568-4555",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysing voice in language policy

T2 - plurality and conflict in Slovene government documents

AU - Savski, Kristof

PY - 2016/11

Y1 - 2016/11

N2 - Contemporary analyses of language policy often tend to presume ideological uniformity, rather than focus on the contrasts between various positions, and the power struggles that those differences bring about. In this paper, I present an approach that implements the notion of voice in language policy analysis to denote the ideological positions and interests of different social actors, in this case as reflected in government documents. I propose a method of analysis based on the discourse-historical approach in critical discourse analysis and demonstrate how this exposes different social actors behind policy documents by focussing on the traces of their participation in policymaking. I analyse two different texts produced by the Slovene government and intended to specify its language policy strategy for the 2007–2011 and 2012–2016 periods. I show that there are two hegemonic voices of linguists behind both texts, one based on values of national unity, and a second based on human rights and broad inclusion. Alongside these, there are various voices from other domains of Slovene society and EU policy, all recontextualised through the prisms of the two dominant voices.

AB - Contemporary analyses of language policy often tend to presume ideological uniformity, rather than focus on the contrasts between various positions, and the power struggles that those differences bring about. In this paper, I present an approach that implements the notion of voice in language policy analysis to denote the ideological positions and interests of different social actors, in this case as reflected in government documents. I propose a method of analysis based on the discourse-historical approach in critical discourse analysis and demonstrate how this exposes different social actors behind policy documents by focussing on the traces of their participation in policymaking. I analyse two different texts produced by the Slovene government and intended to specify its language policy strategy for the 2007–2011 and 2012–2016 periods. I show that there are two hegemonic voices of linguists behind both texts, one based on values of national unity, and a second based on human rights and broad inclusion. Alongside these, there are various voices from other domains of Slovene society and EU policy, all recontextualised through the prisms of the two dominant voices.

KW - Language policy

KW - Critical discourse analysis

KW - Polyphony

KW - Discourse historical approach

KW - Policy documents

U2 - 10.1007/s10993-015-9388-5

DO - 10.1007/s10993-015-9388-5

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

SP - 505

EP - 524

JO - Language Policy

JF - Language Policy

SN - 1568-4555

IS - 4

ER -