Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Angels in marble?
View graph of relations

Angels in marble?: accrediting prior experiential learning in higher education

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Angels in marble? accrediting prior experiential learning in higher education. / Trowler, Paul.
In: Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1996, p. 17-30.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Trowler P. Angels in marble? accrediting prior experiential learning in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 1996;21(1):17-30. doi: 10.1080/03075079612331381427

Author

Trowler, Paul. / Angels in marble? accrediting prior experiential learning in higher education. In: Studies in Higher Education. 1996 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 17-30.

Bibtex

@article{75390594c1724880af8cee453ebf43a7,
title = "Angels in marble?: accrediting prior experiential learning in higher education",
abstract = "After a brief account of the background to the accreditation of prior experiential learning (APEL) in higher education, this paper elaborates on what are usually seen as two contrasting approaches to it: the credit exchange and developmental models. The paper argues that these should be recognised as poles of a continuum rather than dichotomous approaches and subjects each end of this continuum to critical scrutiny. Practical, epistemological, pedagogical and cultural impediments to successful implementation of APEL are explored, the potential of APEL for deepening surveillance of the individual is highlighted and claims made about APEL and equal opportunities are questioned. In particular, the problems associated with taking inappropriate positions on the continuum and of being unclear about the position taken are emphasised. The paper concludes by mapping areas where further research is needed and identifying the limits of the potential of APEL to broaden access to a mass higher education system. ",
author = "Paul Trowler",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1080/03075079612331381427",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "17--30",
journal = "Studies in Higher Education",
issn = "0307-5079",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Angels in marble?

T2 - accrediting prior experiential learning in higher education

AU - Trowler, Paul

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - After a brief account of the background to the accreditation of prior experiential learning (APEL) in higher education, this paper elaborates on what are usually seen as two contrasting approaches to it: the credit exchange and developmental models. The paper argues that these should be recognised as poles of a continuum rather than dichotomous approaches and subjects each end of this continuum to critical scrutiny. Practical, epistemological, pedagogical and cultural impediments to successful implementation of APEL are explored, the potential of APEL for deepening surveillance of the individual is highlighted and claims made about APEL and equal opportunities are questioned. In particular, the problems associated with taking inappropriate positions on the continuum and of being unclear about the position taken are emphasised. The paper concludes by mapping areas where further research is needed and identifying the limits of the potential of APEL to broaden access to a mass higher education system.

AB - After a brief account of the background to the accreditation of prior experiential learning (APEL) in higher education, this paper elaborates on what are usually seen as two contrasting approaches to it: the credit exchange and developmental models. The paper argues that these should be recognised as poles of a continuum rather than dichotomous approaches and subjects each end of this continuum to critical scrutiny. Practical, epistemological, pedagogical and cultural impediments to successful implementation of APEL are explored, the potential of APEL for deepening surveillance of the individual is highlighted and claims made about APEL and equal opportunities are questioned. In particular, the problems associated with taking inappropriate positions on the continuum and of being unclear about the position taken are emphasised. The paper concludes by mapping areas where further research is needed and identifying the limits of the potential of APEL to broaden access to a mass higher education system.

U2 - 10.1080/03075079612331381427

DO - 10.1080/03075079612331381427

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 17

EP - 30

JO - Studies in Higher Education

JF - Studies in Higher Education

SN - 0307-5079

IS - 1

ER -