Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Approaches to studying networks: implications a...
View graph of relations

Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes. / Jack, S L.
In: Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2010, p. 120-137.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Jack SL. Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing. 2010;25(1):120-137. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.010

Author

Jack, S L. / Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes. In: Journal of Business Venturing. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 120-137.

Bibtex

@article{e4f52cc00337474a97dda051989b9b41,
title = "Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes",
abstract = "Concerns have been raised about lack of clarity in conceptual consideration and difficulty of applying the network concept as an analytical tool. These concerns can be associated with reliance on quantitative techniques, designed to look at structural characteristics, when qualitative approaches will reveal other aspects of networks. This paper builds on previous work and considers implications and outcomes of different methodological approaches for network research. Using a Ptolemaic/Copernican analogy it illustrates that both approaches are required to grasp and understand the complexity of networks and the associated activity of networking but that each deals with different aspects and features.",
author = "Jack, {S L}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.010",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "120--137",
journal = "Journal of Business Venturing",
issn = "0883-9026",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes

AU - Jack, S L

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Concerns have been raised about lack of clarity in conceptual consideration and difficulty of applying the network concept as an analytical tool. These concerns can be associated with reliance on quantitative techniques, designed to look at structural characteristics, when qualitative approaches will reveal other aspects of networks. This paper builds on previous work and considers implications and outcomes of different methodological approaches for network research. Using a Ptolemaic/Copernican analogy it illustrates that both approaches are required to grasp and understand the complexity of networks and the associated activity of networking but that each deals with different aspects and features.

AB - Concerns have been raised about lack of clarity in conceptual consideration and difficulty of applying the network concept as an analytical tool. These concerns can be associated with reliance on quantitative techniques, designed to look at structural characteristics, when qualitative approaches will reveal other aspects of networks. This paper builds on previous work and considers implications and outcomes of different methodological approaches for network research. Using a Ptolemaic/Copernican analogy it illustrates that both approaches are required to grasp and understand the complexity of networks and the associated activity of networking but that each deals with different aspects and features.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.010

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 120

EP - 137

JO - Journal of Business Venturing

JF - Journal of Business Venturing

SN - 0883-9026

IS - 1

ER -