Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Are working memory and behavioral attention equ...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • LARRC_Mem&Att_ReadingAndWriting

    Rights statement: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9840-y

    Accepted author manuscript, 661 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Are working memory and behavioral attention equally important for both reading and listening comprehension?: A developmental comparison

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
  • Language and Reading Research Consortium
  • Hui Jiang
  • Kelly Farquharson
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>09/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>Reading and Writing
Issue number7
Volume31
Number of pages29
Pages (from-to)1449-1477
Publication statusPublished
Early online date7/05/18
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

We investigated the extent to which working memory and behavioral attention predicted reading and listening comprehension in grades 1 through 3 and, whether their relative contributions differed by modality and grade. Separate grade samples (N = 370; ns = 125, 123, and 122 for grades 1, 2, and 3 respectively) completed multiple measures of word reading, working memory, and parallel measures of reading and listening comprehension. Teachers and parents provided behavioral attention ratings. Concurrently, working memory was more important for listening than for reading comprehension and predicted significant variance in both modalities across grades, after controlling for background measures and behavioral attention ratings. For both modalities, working memory explained the greatest proportion of variance in grade 3. Behavioral attention predicted variance in grades 1 and 2 for reading comprehension and all grades for listening comprehension. Subsidiary analyses demonstrated that the influence of working memory and behavioral attention on reading comprehension was indirect, through word reading and listening comprehension both concurrently and also longitudinally between grades 1 to 3. These findings indicate that delivery of classroom materials orally will not always be beneficial to the young beginner reader or one who struggles with word decoding, and that children with poor working memory/attention may require additional support to access meaning from both written and spoken text.