We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK


97% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Associating versus proposing or associating wha...
View graph of relations

« Back

Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial


<mark>Journal publication date</mark>09/2006
<mark>Journal</mark>Psychological Bulletin
Number of pages4
<mark>Original language</mark>English


This commentary highlights the strengths of the associative-propositional evaluation model. It then describes problems in proposing a qualitative separation between propositional and associative processes. Propositional processes are instead described as associative. Propositions are ordered associations, whereas many other associations do not depend on the order of the involved elements. Implications of this alternative definition for the phenomenology of thought and for social psychology are discussed.