Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Banality in Politics: Margaret Thatcher and the...
View graph of relations

Banality in Politics: Margaret Thatcher and the Biographers.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Banality in Politics: Margaret Thatcher and the Biographers. / Garnett, Mark A.
In: Political Studies Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 05.2007, p. 172-182.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Garnett MA. Banality in Politics: Margaret Thatcher and the Biographers. Political Studies Review. 2007 May;5(2):172-182. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2007.00127.x

Author

Garnett, Mark A. / Banality in Politics: Margaret Thatcher and the Biographers. In: Political Studies Review. 2007 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 172-182.

Bibtex

@article{acaba7ff9b36456980529bcaeaeffa11,
title = "Banality in Politics: Margaret Thatcher and the Biographers.",
abstract = "There are numerous biographies of Margaret Thatcher, but as yet no full-length study has been written by a political scientist. This is a disappointing omission from the literature, and reflects a general tendency to undervalue biographical studies. One result has been the production of scholarly work on the Conservative party between 1975 and 1990 which is unduly abstract and often misleading. Equally, although some excellent biographies have been produced – and Thatcher's memoirs are among the best of their genre – the unique perspectives of political science can yield some fascinating insights into her career, her party and the changing nature of British government. This article traces some of the crucial interactions which influenced Thatcher – her family background, her experiences within the Conservative party, her electioneering and her conduct of government. It concludes that although Thatcher's personality developed as a result of these encounters, as an adult she affected institutions far more than they affected her. This raises interesting, but not insuperable challenges for political scientists. Individuals do matter, and their influence can be appraised within a broader context. Ironically, it seems that complex characters conform more readily to generalisable norms of political conduct; Thatcher, by contrast, broke many of the accepted rules precisely because her personality was so banal.",
author = "Garnett, {Mark A.}",
note = "RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Politics and International Studies",
year = "2007",
month = may,
doi = "10.1111/j.1478-9299.2007.00127.x",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "172--182",
journal = "Political Studies Review",
issn = "1478-9302",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Banality in Politics: Margaret Thatcher and the Biographers.

AU - Garnett, Mark A.

N1 - RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Politics and International Studies

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - There are numerous biographies of Margaret Thatcher, but as yet no full-length study has been written by a political scientist. This is a disappointing omission from the literature, and reflects a general tendency to undervalue biographical studies. One result has been the production of scholarly work on the Conservative party between 1975 and 1990 which is unduly abstract and often misleading. Equally, although some excellent biographies have been produced – and Thatcher's memoirs are among the best of their genre – the unique perspectives of political science can yield some fascinating insights into her career, her party and the changing nature of British government. This article traces some of the crucial interactions which influenced Thatcher – her family background, her experiences within the Conservative party, her electioneering and her conduct of government. It concludes that although Thatcher's personality developed as a result of these encounters, as an adult she affected institutions far more than they affected her. This raises interesting, but not insuperable challenges for political scientists. Individuals do matter, and their influence can be appraised within a broader context. Ironically, it seems that complex characters conform more readily to generalisable norms of political conduct; Thatcher, by contrast, broke many of the accepted rules precisely because her personality was so banal.

AB - There are numerous biographies of Margaret Thatcher, but as yet no full-length study has been written by a political scientist. This is a disappointing omission from the literature, and reflects a general tendency to undervalue biographical studies. One result has been the production of scholarly work on the Conservative party between 1975 and 1990 which is unduly abstract and often misleading. Equally, although some excellent biographies have been produced – and Thatcher's memoirs are among the best of their genre – the unique perspectives of political science can yield some fascinating insights into her career, her party and the changing nature of British government. This article traces some of the crucial interactions which influenced Thatcher – her family background, her experiences within the Conservative party, her electioneering and her conduct of government. It concludes that although Thatcher's personality developed as a result of these encounters, as an adult she affected institutions far more than they affected her. This raises interesting, but not insuperable challenges for political scientists. Individuals do matter, and their influence can be appraised within a broader context. Ironically, it seems that complex characters conform more readily to generalisable norms of political conduct; Thatcher, by contrast, broke many of the accepted rules precisely because her personality was so banal.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2007.00127.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2007.00127.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 172

EP - 182

JO - Political Studies Review

JF - Political Studies Review

SN - 1478-9302

IS - 2

ER -