Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Barring teachers
View graph of relations

Barring teachers: the new vetting arrangements

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Barring teachers : the new vetting arrangements. / Gillespie, Alisdair.

In: Education and the Law, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2007, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Gillespie, Alisdair. / Barring teachers : the new vetting arrangements. In: Education and the Law. 2007 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 1-18.

Bibtex

@article{8a6df48702c64413b74e91046ad7ce96,
title = "Barring teachers: the new vetting arrangements",
abstract = "This article forms the second part of an examination of the law relating to the vetting and barring system for teachers and those who have access to children. It was seen in the first article (Gillespie, 2006, Education and the Law, 18(1), 19-30) that controversy had erupted when it was disclosed that some teachers were allowed to remain in the teaching profession even after being cautioned for child sex offences. The government sought to review the operation of List 99 (the name given to the list of those barred from teaching) and in the longer term wished to completely rethink its approach to the vetting and barring system. This article critiques these proposals and assesses whether they will be any more effective at protecting vulnerable members of society.",
author = "Alisdair Gillespie",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1080/09539960701231199",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Education and the Law",
issn = "0953-9964",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barring teachers

T2 - the new vetting arrangements

AU - Gillespie, Alisdair

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This article forms the second part of an examination of the law relating to the vetting and barring system for teachers and those who have access to children. It was seen in the first article (Gillespie, 2006, Education and the Law, 18(1), 19-30) that controversy had erupted when it was disclosed that some teachers were allowed to remain in the teaching profession even after being cautioned for child sex offences. The government sought to review the operation of List 99 (the name given to the list of those barred from teaching) and in the longer term wished to completely rethink its approach to the vetting and barring system. This article critiques these proposals and assesses whether they will be any more effective at protecting vulnerable members of society.

AB - This article forms the second part of an examination of the law relating to the vetting and barring system for teachers and those who have access to children. It was seen in the first article (Gillespie, 2006, Education and the Law, 18(1), 19-30) that controversy had erupted when it was disclosed that some teachers were allowed to remain in the teaching profession even after being cautioned for child sex offences. The government sought to review the operation of List 99 (the name given to the list of those barred from teaching) and in the longer term wished to completely rethink its approach to the vetting and barring system. This article critiques these proposals and assesses whether they will be any more effective at protecting vulnerable members of society.

U2 - 10.1080/09539960701231199

DO - 10.1080/09539960701231199

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Education and the Law

JF - Education and the Law

SN - 0953-9964

IS - 1

ER -