Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Begging for control : when are offspring solici...
View graph of relations

Begging for control : when are offspring solicitation behaviours honest?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Begging for control : when are offspring solicitation behaviours honest? / Royle, Nick J.; Parker, Geoff A.; Hartley, Ian R.
In: Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 17, No. 9, 09.2002, p. 434-440.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Royle, NJ, Parker, GA & Hartley, IR 2002, 'Begging for control : when are offspring solicitation behaviours honest?', Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 434-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02565-X

APA

Vancouver

Royle NJ, Parker GA, Hartley IR. Begging for control : when are offspring solicitation behaviours honest? Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2002 Sept;17(9):434-440. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02565-X

Author

Royle, Nick J. ; Parker, Geoff A. ; Hartley, Ian R. / Begging for control : when are offspring solicitation behaviours honest?. In: Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2002 ; Vol. 17, No. 9. pp. 434-440.

Bibtex

@article{e01ae1cc217741489b998163d903495e,
title = "Begging for control : when are offspring solicitation behaviours honest?",
abstract = "There is burgeoning interest in the idea that conspicuous begging displays, when parents are provisioning dependent young, advertise offspring need honestly to parents. Many empirical studies claim to support the theory of honest signalling of need, where parents control resource allocation. The evidence, however, also fits the predictions of recent models for the evolution of costly begging, where offspring control allocation. These models incorporate variation in offspring condition and show that the three main predictions of honest signalling models are also found with models of sibling scramble competition. Consequently, it is difficult to discriminate between the two different modelling approaches from their predictions, despite their having been the focus of much empirical work. In particular, the evidence indicates that the prediction that begging intensity signals offspring need honestly is strongly context dependent. Begging might be {\textquoteleft}honest{\textquoteright} only when the potential for conflict is low and food is not limiting.",
keywords = "parental investment, parent-offspring conflict, scramble competition, honest signalling, provisional behaviour context dependent, ESS, animal behaviour",
author = "Royle, {Nick J.} and Parker, {Geoff A.} and Hartley, {Ian R.}",
year = "2002",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02565-X",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "434--440",
journal = "Trends in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "0169-5347",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Begging for control : when are offspring solicitation behaviours honest?

AU - Royle, Nick J.

AU - Parker, Geoff A.

AU - Hartley, Ian R.

PY - 2002/9

Y1 - 2002/9

N2 - There is burgeoning interest in the idea that conspicuous begging displays, when parents are provisioning dependent young, advertise offspring need honestly to parents. Many empirical studies claim to support the theory of honest signalling of need, where parents control resource allocation. The evidence, however, also fits the predictions of recent models for the evolution of costly begging, where offspring control allocation. These models incorporate variation in offspring condition and show that the three main predictions of honest signalling models are also found with models of sibling scramble competition. Consequently, it is difficult to discriminate between the two different modelling approaches from their predictions, despite their having been the focus of much empirical work. In particular, the evidence indicates that the prediction that begging intensity signals offspring need honestly is strongly context dependent. Begging might be ‘honest’ only when the potential for conflict is low and food is not limiting.

AB - There is burgeoning interest in the idea that conspicuous begging displays, when parents are provisioning dependent young, advertise offspring need honestly to parents. Many empirical studies claim to support the theory of honest signalling of need, where parents control resource allocation. The evidence, however, also fits the predictions of recent models for the evolution of costly begging, where offspring control allocation. These models incorporate variation in offspring condition and show that the three main predictions of honest signalling models are also found with models of sibling scramble competition. Consequently, it is difficult to discriminate between the two different modelling approaches from their predictions, despite their having been the focus of much empirical work. In particular, the evidence indicates that the prediction that begging intensity signals offspring need honestly is strongly context dependent. Begging might be ‘honest’ only when the potential for conflict is low and food is not limiting.

KW - parental investment

KW - parent-offspring conflict

KW - scramble competition

KW - honest signalling

KW - provisional behaviour context dependent

KW - ESS

KW - animal behaviour

U2 - 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02565-X

DO - 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02565-X

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

SP - 434

EP - 440

JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 0169-5347

IS - 9

ER -